Countdown T minus Four months

At the “four month” to poleshift stage there is a noticeable absence of the regular zetatdrone crowd, showing no signs since Christmas. Only ABC and Pietro are visibly active with even Nancy and her astronomy team posting very little. Their images still showing scant evidence of the elusive 12th planet, despite their strong conviction that "it" and the string of moons lie somewhere among the mass of noise on the poorly processed images.

From: djarvinen (jarvinen@proaxis.com)
Subject: Dell and Havas throw in the towel?
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2003-02-10 08:23:13 PST

A quick Googling for messages by J. William Dell and Steve Havas reveal few posts in sci.astro.* since Jan 1.

Havas only has 3, the last one posted Jan 31.
Dell has 18, the last also on Jan 31.

Some doubts creeping in perhaps?

What?  No apology? No concession?

Even 'zetatalk' (35 messages in sci.astro.* this year) last posted on Jan 25.

Looks kind of grim for the old zetatalk bandwagon...

DJ

------o------

ABC is still attempting to play both sides of the fence obviously still unsure where to place his convictions......

From: ABC (none@nospam.com)
Subject: Re: It doesn't look like ZT is backing down.
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2003-02-01 09:09:23 PST
"ABC" <none@nospam.com> wrote:
I guess I'm a moron.<<

Chosp wrote:
Sorry, but there is no guessing involved.<

>>I still can't get zetatalk out of my head, not all of it. Some of the topics, I still believe, but I guess if planet x shows up and people prove nancy was a fraud and zetatalk was all in her head, well, that would be hard for me to deal with that someone could have tricked me so badly.<<

> Especially since you refuse to listen or comprehend the voice of reason.<

>>That's not a troll, that's the truth.<<

> If it is, it is continues to be pathetic. If you are truly in a mood to tell the truth - tell us why you refuse to put in the effort to learn what we have been talking about and/or why it is, in fact, so crystal clear to even the blindest as to why there will be no pole-shift next year, no planet x derived catastrophe, and why you are so utterly spineless. Aren't you ashamed?<

There will be no pole shift because this supposed planet would have to have
an escape velocity greater than our sun's escape velocity, which would imply it could not be in orbit around our sun, which zetatalk says it is.

There will be no pole shift because this planet's magnitude is too small to be seen through an ordinary telescope and at this point in time, if it were really going to make a pass between the earth and the sun as close as zetatalk says, it should be visible in an under $1000 telescope perhaps even right now. Apparently it isn't or it would be in all the newspapers.

There will be no pole shift because nancy is not who she says she is. We don't know exactly what the case is with her, perhaps she is crazy or belongs in an institution for some help or is being used as a tool by some other group for whatever purpose (that group being one solidly founded on this earth, of course).

There will be no pole shift because many of the other predictions zetatalk has made leading up to the pole shift have not panned out to the extent they predicted. No mass crashings of economies, no food shortages any more than what are normally expected, nothing like that. Therefore it would be reasonable to not believe them about planet x.

There will be no pole shift because no one can seem to actually image the planet with any type of telescope whatsoever, no matter how powerful or
expensive, at least not the people on sci.astro or any of "nancy's workers". It's getting close to quittin time and no image. How's it going to be here by May 15?

In addition, the zetatalk description of the effects of the pole shift on the earth do not match with what we think would happen. There is no way that a planet of the type described in zetatalk, or any other reasonable chunk of planet, could cause the type of magnetic effects that would be necessary to rotate the earth's crust 90 degrees within a matter of an hour or so. This is imaginary physics here that the zetas are talking about.

------o------

From: ABC (none@nospam.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: INBOUND! Trends #6
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur
Date: 2003-02-15 19:58:14 PST
zetatalk wrote:
Date  Pixels  %OverBack
> 12/13     4           75%
> 01/18     9
> 02/07    15         25%

15 pixels, wow, it looks like it is growing. Anyone have any comments on
this? How could it be that the image is growing? I thought you people were
certain that nothing was out there.

------o------

From: ABC (none@nospam.com)
Subject: Re: what happens to zetatalk after May ?
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2003-02-18 08:26:29 PST

"Achillefs Margaritis" <axilmar@b-online.gr> wrote
Suppose that there is no Planet X and everything goes normally. What
happens to zetatalk after that ?

Chosp wrote:
 <<plonk>>

I was wondering if planet x is supposed to begin becoming naked eye visible
at the end of March, then we are only about a month away from that. Doesn't
it seem reasonable to expect that we would be able to spot this object in
telescopes by now? I mean, it seems reasonable to me. At what point should
the object, given its current speed and location become visible in
telescopes, that are under $1000? It would have to be some time before the
end of March. Perhaps now?

------o------

......while Pietro appears to be loosing it all together. His postings mere ramblings as his comments become more frequent and more irrational. However most of sci-astro thankfully appears to be ignoring him so I won't bother wasting much space here.

From: Pietro Sommavilla (judoka_61@yahoo.com)
Subject: do exist zetas?
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2003-02-11 07:34:00 PST

suddenly..the President George W. Bush says that there is Alien life
on others planets..ooops..!

------o------

Back