Some months back I subscribed to the Prep2003 for a few weeks to get a feel for the list. Prep2003 has more than once been mentioned as a much more tolerant list, yet at the time there was a lot of discussions about a Jim/Tim disruptor that was banned for a while. More important, during the weeks I subscribed, I did not find one single posting that contained any factual information, and the signal-to-noise ration was 1:100. I can assure you that we will do our utmost to avoid any similar situation with the T lists.”

Regards, Jan

PS.

Brian will of course be allowed to make any reasonable comments to this posting. If however he chooses the same approach as has been seen here recently, then those messages may mysteriously disappear as some of Brian's messages have already. Should Brian choose to start the "Christer" game by getting a bunch of new e-mail addresses, he will of course be able to post his initial messages before the ban is on. As Clipper has successfully demonstrated in the past, we will however win such a game in the end.

Ok so he’s now just confirmed the lie by his own mouth, as before this posting I was not supposed to be on moderation, yet my posts were being “stealth intercepted”. Now fast-forward some six months and I notice this………………..

------o------

                            http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tt-social/message/5923

----- Original Message -----

From:  "jakaby2002" jakaby@m...

To: "TT Social" <TT-Social@YahooGroups.com>

Date:  Wed Oct 30, 2002  9:41 pm

Subject: "sapphireorb" Enterprise2002 Brian Gillbank et al.

“Brian Gillbanks;

It is not sporting of me to have a battle of wits, with an unarmed man. But, here we are. Go back and finish your debate in Sci.astro Before you try to start another.”

PS: I will post later on "con" trails page, my latest pics.

…………..so I replied explaining I am not Sapphire. My reply did not appear on the tt-groups although from this response below you can plainly see they received it as he’s apologising for the error after my correction, and close examination of the number order on the archives shows that some are missing. However if done carefully full moderator status can alter dates, time and number order if necessary. [See moderator facilities.] Although most of the time they can’t be bothered using it properly so the discrepancies show.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tt-social/message/5924

----- Original Message -----

From:  "jakaby2002" <jakaby@m...>

To: "TT Social" <TT-Social@YahooGroups.com>

Date:  Thu Oct 31, 2002  1:29 am
Subject: Re: "sapphireorb" Enterprise2002 Brian Gillbank et al.

“My apologies; to set the record straight. Sapphireorb is not Brian Gillbanks. Just someone else with an axe to grind ;o)”

Regards

J.William Dell

[Full story and proof]

-----o-----

Jan the hypocrite

(The following are from one of my own secret “insider” sources giving some insight into the inner sanctum of the “tt-posse”.) [tt-posse inner sanctum]

From:  Jan
Date:  Wed Mar 6, 2002  6:53 pm
Subject: [tt-posse] Michael L Cunningham & sci.astro
To:  tt-posse

 
Hi all,

I would like to propose some new principles for the Posse to consider:

• Statements on other lists like sci.astro should be included in the decision process for the Posse. E.g. false accusations against Nancy, ZT or TT on sci.astro should be taken into account as if they were posted on a TT list.

• Patterns should be taken into account. E.g. when somebody touting scientific methods rejects the prediction of volcano eruptions for 2002  based on 2 months of data, ref Michael's last posting.

Concerning the first proposed principle, I think some of Michael L Cunningham's latests "achievements" on sci.astro may be of interest:

• And another fool raises his head from the sewage pit of the occult... (In a Sitchin discussion)

• So says the dumb ass that follows fools. (To slackerattheinboxdotorg)

• I have a pretty good idea you don't know what in the hell you're looking at to begin with! (To Steve Havas)

• These are the very same people who don't want you trusting any government. Makes a whole lot of sense doesn't it? You'd think their "ruling" board would be patterned after that of the Plains Indians rather than having them spouting the advantages of a dictatorship. (to josX, in reponse to his banning here)

• Her way or the highway. There is no wrong with Nancy. Think the party line or be thrown to the wolves. (In this thread, he also "accuses" slackerattheinboxdotorg first to be Steve, then me.)

I would say that Michael L Cunningham's permanent ban from the TT lists should now be overdue.

Regards,
Jan

-----o-----

From: Jan <anybody@attglobal.net>

Date: Sun Mar 10, 2002  9:46 am

Subject: Re: [tt-posse] Draft for the tt-skeptic description

To:  TT Posse

Antii,

Your TT Skeptic draft intro is pretty good.

However, the idea for a TT Skeptic list is not so good. Healthy discussions about ZetaTalk and the consequences of the Pole Shift should be allowed on the current lists. I have never been against such discussions on any of the TT lists. It's where those discussions drag on, where people obviously are only here to disrupt, where the Posse has failed time and time again by being far too liberal.

[He’s just proposed possible tt-posse action, ie, banning and moderation of tt-members who speak against Nancy and ZT on entirely unconnected groups, let alone TT itself so how can he claim healthy discussions should be allowed on the tt-groups? Now he’s contradicting himself and showing just how much a hypocrite he really is.]

 If people want a TT Skeptic list, let them make it themselves or use a public forum like sci.astro. Maybe instead we would need a TT Chat or TT Open Discussion list?

Regards,

Jan

-----o-----

Back