 |
||
|
On
Saturday the 16th November 2002 during the
Zetatalk
IRC Channel,
Nancy admitted those in attendance that her imaginary Zeta friends have
been telling them lies since1995. (ZT means she is speaking as Zetas.) http://www.zetatalk.com/index/cnov1602.htm [14:30]
(NancyL) ZT:
If Nancy is viewed as being perceived as accurate, believable, then a
hundred times more disinfo sites and agents would be sent forth to
counter this than have actually be dispatched. [14:31]
(NancyL)
ZT: Thus, it is a clever maneuver, on our part, and with Nancy's
cooperation, to do a Columbo, act befuddled, appear to make a slip, on
occasion. Note
the Zetas are saying she is not to be perceived as accurate or
believable, deliberately making mistakes so as not to draw attention,
but attention is what “The awakening” is supposed to be about
getting out “the word” as loudly as possible. [14:31]
(NancyL)
ZT: These slips are carefully placed so as to placate the establishment,
but not confuse the readership who is reading with BROAD interest, and
looking at the overall trends. Mistakes
so as not to mess up the government, although she’s already denounced
G W Bush and his administration as evil, can you get more aggressive
than that? But not to confuse the readership? Yet how are they supposed
to know what is now truth or lie, believing everything she say’s. So
the overall trend now is deception and disinformation is it not? [14:33]
(NancyL) ZT:
Early in the game the Hale-Bopp ploy was used, and in truth Nancy was
under the impression until last in the game that there WAS no comet! [14:37]
(NancyL)
ZTL The group wanting to have the public look in the OPPOSITE direction
of Orion was placated, however, as Nancy steadfastly maintained, in
NancyTalk, that there was no Hale-Bopp comet. The
Hale Bopp issue was the biggest argument on sci-astro where they proved
her wrong, now the Zetas say it was a deliberate ploy and part of some
game. The world is about to end and they want to play games and this
from an advanced race of aliens? Secondly they now admit there was no
comet yet lied to Nancy making their emissary believe there was,
destroying her credibility. [14:38]
(NancyL)
ZT: Then in 1996, we slipped in a warning in ZetaTalk that they were
lining the false/fake orbit up with the orbit of a REAL comet, and when
this emerged in 1997, WE, the Zetas, were not wrong. [14:38]
(NancyL)
ZT: Nancy was a bit miffed at having been used in this manner, but
the benefit soon dawned upon her. So
in 1997 Nancy knew the Zetas were deceiving her, yet still allowed them
to relay messages knowing that any of them could also be lies and
subsequently continued to write Zetatalk detailing how only STS play
games, deceive and lie. Yet purposely deceiving her own TT members
showing them as much trust as the Zetas had shown her. (Without trust
how can there be any credibility?) [14:38]
(NancyL)
ZT: In like manner, in the early days of Planet
sightings, we laid out trip points to placate the
etablishement. [14:39]
(NancyL)
ZT: It was a Mag 2, and at the time when ZetaTalk was building
international acclaim due to its utter accuracy on all other issues,
THIS simply point placated NASA and the arrogant elite. They’ve
just admitted to lying, giving one example of Hale Bopp which is on the
Accuracy page yet claim Zetatalk is accurate. How much more of their
topics contain half truth and lies? [14:39]
(NancyL)
ZT: And how would Nancy and ZetaTalk ever recover from this? They
presumed this a fatal error. [14:40]
(NancyL)
ZT: When the sightings began in early 2001, this was the cry, the
Magnitude issue, and our explanations that OUR eyes could see it and OUR
equipment register it as a Mag 2 deemed inadequate. There
have been no sightings except Steve Havas who claims he saw it April
2001 visually when they can’t image it now, in 2002, six months before
its arrival with more sensitive Infra-red CCD imaging. And Mag 2 as seen
by the Zetas? I thought we were supposed to be looking for it? Really
nice of them to give us all false figures so we can prove its existence.
But then what else have they lied about? [14:44]
(TerrorDactyl)
so which bits of your 100 per cent accuracy record are purposeful
mistakes?? Is May 2003 a clever maneuver on your part too? Wait til
sci.astro get their hands on this, you've dug your own grave Nancy [14:45]
(blindfaith)
So, how do we know the Zetas aren't lying about the whole premise of
Planet X, if they lied intentionally in the past? [14:46] (TerrorDactyl) seriously though, you expect right minded people to foloow that as a reason for your mistakes?? [14:47]
(NancyL)
BlindFaith, please read ZT and perceive the mission. Do you know what a white
lie is? And
there it is from Nancy own mouth an admission it’s a lie. So if we
were in any doubt before she’s just been kind enough to confirm it.
And what is a white lie? Yes it’s a lie, at best a half truth both of
which constitute deception and STS behaviour according to the Zetas and
Nancy. [14:48] (TerrorDactyl))any other predictions that are clever manuevers by the
zetas we need to know about? [14:49] (seeker) i hardly think I'll ever apologize to you nancy..i believe it's you
who owes a great many people an
apology [14:52] (TerrorDactyl) you know, nutcases always trip themselves up
eventually ------o------
|