![]() |
|||
|
“William
J. Dell, that superb research documentarian….” Nancy
Lieder Nancy
originally tried to pass him off as some kind of CCD expert who had
verified Havas’ images, but my research found him on the TT-groups
recorded as a simple documentarian with no qualifications or practical
experience in astronomy whatsoever. Second of the self proclaimed “expert”
astronomy team who spent considerable time on sci-astro trying to
recruit the membership into helping verifying the images. (Nominated and
won the sci-astro “Kook” award for October 2002.
From: zetatalk
(zetatalk@zetatalk.com) Subject:
Planet
X: NOT NOISE Newsgroups:
sci.astro,
sci.astro.amateur Date:
2002-10-02
11:44:00 PST As
J. William Dell explains: To:
Nancy Leider From:
J.William Dell Subject:
SHAVAS 3-R, 4-R, 5-R Greetings
and to the point; I
have had an opportunity to look at all the SHAVAS R Filter pictures
individually. These were loaded in freeware Cadet Calibration Fits
software using all 6 dark plates. I would like to point out anomolies in
Frames 3-R, 4-R, 5-R In
frame 3-R, is an object just above the circle known as Steve's
candidate. In frame 4-R, is an anomolie in the exact coordinates that
were given. In frame 5-R, is the object that has been given by the Zetas
as Planet X. These pictures were taken, so I am to understand, as 2
minute exposures. With
red light bending, are we seeing the actual Planet X in different
locations in the different 2 minute pictures? In frame 4-R specifically,
have we captured the red light shifting within this one picture (which
has created what looks like a moving object on the exposure)? I
am using the freeware Avis Fits Viewer program, which is quite good, and
it includes as part of its features an ability to recognize stars and
indicate pixel intensity. When passing the cross hairs over objects in
Fits files it recognizes the objects in 4-R and 5-R as filmed
objects on the picture. It ignores the object in 3-R as it also ignores
pixel noise or Hot? Pixels on all pictures. (Hope that makes sense, in
essence, Avis Fits viewer considers the objects in 4-R & 5-R as
real.) With
the red shifting occuring, when doing a summary stacked image,
especially median, any object not appearing on different pictures in the
same place would probably be removed. Only in Sum, or with an object
with high enough intensity in one picture, would an object appear. I was out last night looking (without telescope) to determine location. Just at the horizon was the star above Orions belt (Ori_Alp_58, it has a common name, don't know it off hand) which has a high red factor. Boy was it moving around in the atmosphere, it made the point to me about shifting. Kindest
regards J.William
Dell [On
questioning Mr Dell’s identity and qualifications none as usual were
forthcoming so I did a little detective work and came up with this from
Zetatalk.] -----o-----
http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use90133.htm “William
J. Dell, that superb research documentarian, has located an excellent
web site which presents Hapgood’s theory of the Ice Ages as explained
by shifting crust, complete with graphics.” [Shortly
after this discovery and posting it to the sci-astro groups Mr Dell
arrived there and with great effort I finally got him to give us some
details.] -----o----- From:
J.William
Dell Newsgroups:
sci.astro Date:
2002-10-22
08:25:04 PST
I
am the founder and owner of the corporation Jakaby Development
Corporation (est.1981 British Columbia Canada Registry). I also have
other business interests not related to this issue. My phone number is
available on line if you wish to speak to me. I am not located in
Vancouver BC or the "Lower Mainland". As my Email address
indicates I am in Mid BC. jakaby@midbc.com [Oddly
enough same location as Steve Havas.] In
regards to this issue, I am involved in image processing, analysis and
media transfer, as a contract consultant in wood, mineral, and tourism
industries. I
also have experience and have taught courses in publishing, computers
and public speaking through our college/University and other contracts. I
am involved on a contract basis with other companies in rendering
content to Print, Web, Film and other Media. With this I am familiar
with photo imaging, processing, and analysis through my work and my
contacts in those fields. I
trust this is what you are looking for, J.William
Dell [Not
one qualification in astronomy or CCD imaging, FITS analysis, not even
the mention of his own equipment, despite trying to make the sci-astro
membership believe he was some kind of expert.] ------o------
|