 |
||
|
“I'd
say sue his pants off, but then again that's probably the lawyer in me
talking. It's probably not worth messing with.” Nancy
Lieder
Hazelwood
originally joined tt as an ordinary member. Plying the groups with “get
rich quick” and “Pyramid” schemes in an attempt to line his
pockets, which got him banned for his efforts. From there he began
producing his own site, his own e-group Prep-2003, followed by the
inevitable books promoting his particular ideals of the 12th
planet scenario, much to the annoyance of Nancy as he seemed better
suited to the public arena so did far better in promoting himself among
the media. One need only mention his name on the tt-groups to get an
almost instant response, and not a good one I might add. Unfortunately
much of Nancy’s antics have now been lost with the deletion of the tt-watch
archives, but I’ve included those I found to give a flavor of her
feelings on the subject. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tt-watch/message/4512 Date:
Sat
Jun 16, 2001 10:26 am Subject:
Re:
BLINDSIDED book I've
already got a book out, and it sells poorly. E-Book do even worse. You
may very well be in a copyright infringement situation, "drawing
heavily" is the key word. 2003 is a ZetaTalk statement, as NOWHERE
else is this claim made! I have an
arrangement with a publisher,
and you are infringing on HIM too. So you can't proceed, frankly,
without a lawsuit and damage to me. Inevitably, one will ask why 2003
and get pointed to ZetaTalk. You can't avoid this. So it comes down to
me and ZetaTalk speaking to the issue, and we are very accessible to the
media, etc., and get out there (sci.astro, Sightings) and take the head.
YOU should not be the focus of attention, especially by using
copyrighted material. Remove ZetaTalk from your book (this includes
2003), and what do you have?
>Nancy,
Hi, I've written a book that draws from your material and Troubled
Times. I'm including it here for your perusal. If you request a copy
I'll mail one to you too.
I
make reference to you & TT in the intuitive section plus give TT a
whole lot of credit at the end.
There
has to be catchy, consise entertaining way of getting this material out
to the public at large without people having to accept the way you get
your material.
The
most important information on the planet still needs to be packaged in a
palatable format. Hollywood customizing!, which is where I grew up,
community and family. I've done my best to be entertaining and not step
too far out of what I consider the public will accept. I'm also very
down to earth and don't speak, write or choose my material above what I
feel the public at LARGE will digest.
Thank
You for your time.
Mark
Hazlewood ------o-----
Date:
Sat
Jun 16, 2001 12:26 pm Subject:
Re:
[tt-watch] Re: BLINDSIDED book I'm
really glad you answered this guy on the lists, Nancy.
Sol ------o------
Date:
Sat
Jun 16, 2001 12:50 pm Subject:
Re:
[tt-watch] Re: BLINDSIDED book He
was probably writing to me personally to try to get an
"agreement" so he could approach a publisher. These electronic
book folks will take anyone, as YOU pay, not they, for this. If anything
like that happens, I'll write the publishers, and that's the cabash to
it. Sol
wrote: >I'd
say sue his pants off, but then again that's probably the lawyer in me
talking. It's probably not worth messing with.< ------o------
Date:
Sat
Jun 16, 2001 1:16 pm Subject:
Re:
[tt-watch] Re: BLINDSIDED book there's
more speculation available, out there. if the book was thesis, could
ZetaTalk be cited? But drawing heavily, that's just not doing one's own
homework....
------o------
Date:
Sat
Jun 16, 2001 4:46 pm Subject:
Re:
BLINDSIDED book Wouldn't
there be more benefit from getting the word out than harm from copyright
infringement? Why worry about it as money will soon be worthless. I
would think anyone who would spread the word would be beneficial, even
if it is someone trying to make a buck. The last laugh will be on him,
where's he going to spend it?
------o-----
From:
Nancy Lieder <zetatalk@z...> Point
1: ZetaTalk is given away from free on my web site. Web whacking is
cheap and as afordable as a book. 50% of the US residents, for instance,
have web access. Point
2: the BIG danger is a distorted message.
Let a copyright infringment happen, and the word gets twisted.
Did ZetaTalk say that or did Mark?? (this is a favored takeover
technique of the CIA, by the way) [Rubbish
controversy would get people swarming to have a peek at Zetatalk, would
raise Nancy’s profile in the media and make a big effort towards
getting out “the word”. What she say’s doesn’t make sense.] Point
3: next we have Mark getting asked for interviews, as didn't he say [Ah
a hint, electronic books do not sell as well as paperback and hardback,
they’re not as popular. If anyone were really interested in getting
the message to everyone all avenues would be taken, regardless,
especially as she keeps making the point that monetary considerations
aren’t important. Besides Mark is already getting more interviews than
Nancy, he’s been on the US radio and TV so how can it raise his
profile more and besides so long as he’s warning everyone of Earth’s
impending doom he’s accomplishing the “good guy’s” agenda. Isn’t
he?] Point
5: getting the word out to RUSSIA, my publisher and I virtually gave it
to Sophia House for free, so the Russian people would get the book
there. Mark is a bucks guy, if you'll recall, and I'm dirt poor because
I focus on the mission. What contributions has he given to Troubled
Times et al? [Not
even a good point all she’s doing is to try and show how generous she
is. This isn’t even an argument against Mark. Besides no publisher is
going to give away a publication, they’re out to make profits not
losses and I don’t for one minute believe they bought into Nancy’s
scenario, only the money making side.] j-smith6@h...
wrote: >Wouldn’t
there be more benefit from getting the word out than harm from copyright
infringement?< ------o------
|