"If I am combining 7 weeks before passage

with the unaided eye, and visible during the day,

in a SINGLE sentence,

this can be misinterpreted."

Nancy Lieder 12th April,2003

 

".....Nancy (and the Zetas?)

have now amended the day-time visibility

period from the original 7 weeks

to only two weeks before the poleshift itself."

QueenVee (AKA Victoria Ridout) 15th April, 2003

 

 

Once again it would appear that the Zetas and Nancy have once again failed to fore fill yet another prediction  with that of the seven week daytime visibility period. To confuse the issue she is trying to put the blame on her own faithful for misinterpreting the Zeta words and now back peddling to cover the missing rogue planet.

 

Session Ident: #zetatalk

April 12th 2003

 

<NancyL> If I am combining 7 weeks before passage with the unaided eye, and visible during the day, in a SINGLE sentence, this can be misinterpreted.

<NancyL> However, I find a full analysis of what the Zetas have said to divide the two.

<NancyL> Given the VAST amount of ZT, written on the fly, and the ASTONISHING accuracy of it, nit picking is not worthy.

 

TT Watch

Apr 15, 2003

 

From: "queenvee59" <queenvee59@h...>
Date: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:46 pm
Subject: PX Daytime Visibility Period -- 7 weeks or 2 weeks before poleshift?

PX Daytime Visibility Period
-- 7 weeks or 2 weeks before poleshift?

As most of you are aware, I posed the following question to Nancy/the Zetas in last Saturday's ZetaTalk session (April 12):

"ZT states: `PX will be visible in the daytime sky, 7 wks before passage.... It will be seen in the same place by the ignorant public, noted by a farmer in his fields, commented to others....' If the passage is to occur no later than Jun.1, then PX should be daytime visible now -- and yet most are unable to see it in the night sky. Could the Zetas provide an explanation? Has the passage date changed?"

Nancy replied as follows:

"Queen, I should gather ALL the places this 7 week and daytime sighting are mentioned, as I did with the Iraq war thing on Mar 22, so it can be put to rest."

Nancy has since gathered those sections of ZetaTalk that mention the 7-week period and daytime sighting, and inserted them into the Saturday log (see: http://www.zetatalk.com/index/capr1203.htm). I have reviewed those sections (as I had BEFORE the ZetaTalk session), but still do not find an answer to my question there. The ZetaTalk sections provided by Nancy clearly support the premise and validity of my question, and do not answer it in any way.

However, just when I had resigned myself that Nancy/the Zetas would not address this quite reasonable question and confusing issue, I was extremely surprised to find the following "Nancy Lieder Planet-X Update" on the Coast-to-Coast website, dated April 14, 2003:

"The Zetas have said that seven weeks before passage you and I can go out and look at it and see it without binoculars…it'll be somewhere in the daylight sky," Lieder told me in October of 2002, when I spoke with her for an After Dark article. I caught up with Nancy Lieder this afternoon and asked her about her earlier quote. She now said that Planet X wouldn't actually be visible in daylight, until its closest approach between May 15th and June 1st...." (see http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page112.html)

So it would appear that Nancy (and the Zetas?) have now amended the day-time visibility period from the original 7 weeks to only two weeks before the poleshift itself.

I just wish she had clarified that in the ZetaTalk session, and saved us all a lot of grief....

Best,
QueenVee

------o------

And she couldn't even be bothered to tell her own Zeta faithful on the prior IRC, rather waiting and making the whole thing up in the full limelight of a wider radio audience. In seven years this figure has never changed, yet she waits and chooses a period when those waiting to see planet X during the day, report they can see nothing, then turn on her to begin questioning her validity before. Why not two years ago if the statement was confusing? Why not six months back? Because the reality is beginning to show - there is no mystery planet and Nancy is playing for time before HER end finally comes in May.

 

So what's next Nancy a change in poleshift dates? (Pull the other one its got bells on.)

Next