|
|
"Why
is there a joke about the stock market
altered
and used as proof of crashes?"
Sean
White
Nancy
is getting so desperate she's using comedy material as proof of the
Zetas predictions, although failing to verify the source before
announcing it on the IRC chat.
Session
Start: Sat Feb 15 11:38:07 2003
Session Ident: #zetatalk
[13:58]
<NancyL> SIGN of the TIMES
#5
[13:58] <NancyL>
Investment Advice: If you had bought $1000.00 worth of Nortel stock one
year ago, it would now be worth $49.00. With Enron, you would have
$16.50 of the original $1,000.00. With Worldcom, you would have less
[13:58] <NancyL>
than $5.00 left. If you had bought $1,000.00 worth of Pepsi (the
soda, not the stock) one year ago, drank all the soda, then turned in
the bottles for a 5 cent deposit, you would have $107.00.
[14:05]
* NYCtrader has joined #zetatalk
[14:05] <NYCtrader>
Nancy: 1 year ago (2/14/02) Nortel stock closed at
$5.72, so $1000 bought 174.8, or rounded 175 shares; on friday 2/14/03,
Nortel stock closed at $2.31, so your investment is $404; so your
statement that if you had bought $1000 of Nortel stock 1 year ago and
now it being worth $49, is incorrect
[14:09] <NancyL>
NYC Trader, this was not
my statement, forwarded to me, so I did not check the accuracy, sorry.
------o------
From:
Sean White <sirgrim007@y...>
Date: Mon
Feb 17, 2003 8:41 pm
Subject: Jokes
in IRC Sessions used as proof.
Why is there a joke about the stock
market altered and used as proof of crashes? Here's the joke, enjoy.
In October of 2000, two friends, Bill and Bob, each received a $1,000
bonus from their employer, Nortel Networks. Bill, being a financially
conscientious person, put the whole $1,000 into Nortel Networks stock.
He was able to purchase 15 shares at $63.25 each (plus my broker fees,
oops! I did say this was a fictional story). Having watched the Nortel
stock climb and climb, he felt very good about this investment, happy
that he was preparing for the future.
Bob, being a more care-free sort of dude, did something different with
his thousand bucks. He went into the liquor store and purchased 34 cases
of beer. Bob also felt very good about his investment: 34 cases x 24 =
816 bottles of beer! Bob calculated he could drink about 15 bottles per
week, and he wouldn?t have to buy beer for a whole year.
Bill, of course, was appalled by Bob?s purchase, and berated him
constantly about it. As months went by, Bill excitedly watched the stock
price, and saw it dwindle. ?It?ll go back up,? he?d say. Meanwhile, Bob,
who has been reaping the benefits of his investment on a daily basis,
would reply, ?Sure it will. Hang in there, buddy?.
As the value of the stock continued to fall, there was beginning to be a
noticeable dent in the beer pile. Bill, being sure that the stock had
hit rock-bottom, still was berating Bob for his frivolous purchase,
telling him, ?Your beer will be gone in six months! Who knows what my
stock will be worth!!?
Well, summer came and went, and hard times at Nortel continued. Both
Bill and Bob lost their jobs in the final round of layoffs. In order to
raise some cash to help through the rough times, Bill sold his 15
shares, at that day?s value of $5.40, and received $81. Bill stopped by
Bob?s house later that day (everyone needs a friend, and a beer, during
rough times), and as luck would have it, there were two bottles of Bob?s
beer left. Bob, being a compassionate friend, offered to share his last
two bottles of beer with his friend. Bill appreciated the gesture, and
enjoyed the cold beer , but he felt a little guilty.
?At least I got 81 bucks out of it. You have nothing now,? he said. ?That?s
ok,? replied Bob. Maybe you can help me return all these empties.? So
they loaded up the empty bottles and proceeded to the beer store. Bob
went to the counter to collect his deposit on the bottles. ?Thirty-four
cases x 24 bottles, at 10 cents per bottle, that comes to $81.60,? the
friendly Beer store clerk said to Bob as he handed him the money. Bill
was speechless.
[Sean
White (aka Sirgrim) is a member of TT-INC and moderator of the Zetatalk
IRC, yet here he is showing open dissent against Nancy and destroying
her credibility on her accuracy topics. (Careful Sean it's likely to get
you the chop.)]
------o------
Next |