|
"May
15, 2003 is given as the date
but
it has always been stated
"shortly
thereafter".
What
shortly thereafter MEANS
is
being withheld until later as
the
exact moment will only benefit the
STS,
per the Z's."
Nancy
Lieder
Session
Start: Sat Feb 22 13:21:46 2003
Session Ident: #zetatalk
[14:17]
<IterativeDance>
nancy, you've
mentioned to me that tom bearden is
"full of hot
air" - but are any of the people he mentions/endorses, with their
devices, not so full of hot air?
[14:18]
<NancyL> Iterative, since the start of 2002, unless ANOTHER
1.
predicts, 2. has a prediction accuracy track record, then no comment.
[14:18] <NancyL>
ZetaTalk does both 1 and 2.
[14:48]
<NancyL>
Frank1, I must say that I have never found the Zetas wrong, NEVER, and
thus 100% that their predictions will occur.
[100%
accuracy? What about the famous Zeta lie over Hale-Bopp?]
[14:48]
<JohnJ> What
about them lying to you about Hale-bopp?
[14:50] <NancyL>
JohnJ, the Zetas said in 1995 that what was being pointed to as HB was a
nova, and the ESO bore this out as NO comet emissions found.
[She's
still trying to say that Hale-Bopp wasn't a comet, despite the Zeta
admission of a lie. Can she not make up her mind? Doesn't say much for
the 100% accuracy.]
[14:51]
<obany>
johnj is banned, he was disruptive last week too
[Well
he was invisible or using another ID as I didn't find him on the
previous weeks log. How convenient, especially when asking pertinent
questions Obany.]
------o------
During
the same session the topic of the date cropped up.
[14:18]
<Songoku_IRC>
the shift is always for the 15th may 2003 or later?
[14:21]
<NancyL>
Song, May 15, 2003 is given as the date but it has always been stated
"shortly thereafter".
[14:22]
<NancyL>
What shortly thereafter MEANS is being withheld until later as the exact
moment will only benefit the STS, per the Z's.
[If
a 12th planet was inbound and being covered-up, the Government STS, etc,
will have calculated this thing down to the last minute and second so
which STS are the Zetas hiding this info from?]
[14:22]
<NancyL> But
they have stated you should be in your safe place by that date.
[And
if it doesn't show they'll all feel safe but very, very silly.]
[14:22]
* [3j] has
joined #zetatalk
[14:22]
<[3j]> so
its not may 15th??
[14:23] <NancyL>
3J shortly after May 15, 2003, very shortly thereafter.
[14:24]
<NancyL>
You should be in your safe place then, period.,
[Is
this the opportunity to start moving the date?]
------o------
Next was
a question about daytime visibility
[14:53] <Jeremy>
Nancy: Given that
light pollution and atmospheric
conditions affect the visibility of PX, can they state what country it
will
likely be sighted by the naked eye in first?
[14:58] <NancyL>
Jerremy,
visibility depends upon clear skies, etc, and good exposure.
[14:58] <NancyL>
I get asked this
a LOT, just when it will be visible from
this or that town.
[14:59] <Jeremy>
I personally suspect that some countries will have an
earlier view of it
[14:59] <NancyL>
I suggest they do what I did, buy a copy of SkyMap or
similar program, enter location, date/time, and constellation wanting to
be
viewed.
[14:59] <NancyL>
If it is NOT on the horizon, will say so, and will show you WHERE in the
dome over your head at that time you can expect the object.
[15:00] <NancyL>
This will NOT be a complex as large as the moon on first sighting, but
this will grow over the 7 weeks.
[15:00] <NancyL>
The Z's have
suggested that those serious about viewing check the TEAM image pages,
and get familiar with the size of the current complex, the appearance,
etc.
[15:00] <NancyL>
Keep this up, and get familiar (right now, just a fraction of Jupiter
size, 5-7% or so) so you will know what you are looking for!
[15:11] <NancyL>
However, in April, I'm going to be looking in the evening, late
afternnon, yes.
[15:11] <Frank1>
what if by some chance it isnt there?
[15:12] <NancyL>
Frank1, given the
constant affirmation that the Zetas are not wrong, I'm not even thinking
about it not happening.
[Well
up to now they've lied and deceived which she is taking as constant
affirmation, not a very reliable source. But basically she doesn't have
a clue. Notice how she never actually answers Jeremy's question? Yet
you'd think the Zetas could help her be more "accurate".]
Session Close: Sat
Feb 22 15:18:42 2003
------o------
Next |
