![]() |
||
|
TT Social
From: "John
Frick <byrd65@h...>" <byrd65@h...>
Date: Mon Feb 10, 2003 7:12 am Subject: An open letter to Nancy Lieder I have written a very important letter to Nancy Lieder, and I attempted to send it to her from the Zetatalk web site about a week or so ago, but I do not think it went though. I think it is important for her to get this message as well as anyone else that follows the messages of otherworldly or extradimensional prophets. Hopefully Nancy reads this board from time to time.
Here is my letter to Nancy:
Hi nancy,
I am writing to you because I have VERY important information to tell
you on the nature of the experiences you are now having. I've heard
you on Coast to Coast twice, and at one time I leaned towards thinking
you were a nut, but I no longer think that. There is something that
Author, John Keel called "the tiger behind the door
prophecy", and I am certain that this is what you are now
experiencing. Over and over again throughout history, channeled beings
have brought their prophecies to humans, and most of their
I truly hope you find this useful, and avoid being destroyed mentally by these beings (many have been). John Keel avoided total disaster by not allowing himself to grab onto a single point of reference when trying to interpret what these beings wanted, and who they were. John Keel is the most well studied and experienced of all UFO searchers that ever were. I would take his words seriously. ------o------ From:
Tristan Faulkner <everything_tristan@y...>
I'm sure Nancy has entertained your advice
but the fact is, the Z's has made many predictions and have an
incredible track record. Nobody has even come close to what Nancy has
achieved. To think that she is deluded may help you stomach what makes
you uneasy but those of us who have followed Zetatalk from the start
know different. Have you even seen the results of the Z's track
record? If not, follow this link and educate yourself.
To not entertain these facts and not prepare, is to hurt only yourself and possibly, the ones you love.
------o------ From: "Michael
<txyall@y...>" <txyall@y...> It's interesting how
people are willing to except the words of someone with no [It's interesting how the TT membership is willing to take the word of Nancy who has no proven track record either except for an awful lot of speculation and rumor provided by that same TT membership.] ------o------ From:
"John Frick <byrd65@h...>"
<byrd65@h...>
I've seen the track record and it's very
impressive. I already stated that these beings have the ability to
predict the future. I am not a skeptic by any stretch of the
imagination. These beings have made a lot of successful predictions in
the past to other contactees, which convinced those people and their
followers that the main prediction was infallable. This has probably
occured
thousands of times in this century alone. I never said that Nancy is deluded, just that she is being tricked by very clever beings.
Also, this subject does not make me uneasy. I
believe that the human race faces a collapse into a primitive society
that could happen at any time, by any number of means. This doesn't
bother me because I am unafraid of death. Having Planet X come rolling
around would be one of the better ways this could happen if for no
other reason, seeing a planet a quarter the size of the moon in the
sky would be pretty darned exciting. Unless this thing is in some
other dimension, it's just not coming.
I can't wait to hear what the Zetans excuse
will be. No doubt the paranormal monsters that create these events
will have something clever cooked up to feed Nancy and her followers.
Unfortunately the pattern will continue and Nancy will just be
considered a certified nut job by most, instead of the true situation
of her being the innocent and quite sane dupe of extradimensional
beings. And then they'll move on to some other poor soul waiting to be
deceived.
Just remember what I am saying now when the excuses are given. ------o------ From:
"Michael <txyall@y...>"
<txyall@y...>
--- In tt-social@yahoogroups.com,
"John Frick <byrd65@h...>"
wrote: Joh Keel, no track record? Come on! you say that to Whitley Strieber, Stanton Friedman or Bud Hopkins, and any one of those guys would bust a gut laughing.<< Just because YOU believe
that John Keel is an expert on UFO's and because ------o------ From:
"John Frick <byrd65@h...>"
<byrd65@h...> If it's going to be a quarter the size of a full moon by May, it should at least appear to the naked eye about as bright as any star in Orion the Hunter by now. I think it would be all over the news if it were. If the media is all ignoring it (because the government might want to cover this up), then tell me where to look, because I would like to see it. I mean that. I love astronomy, and to see a new planet with the naked eye would be pretty exciting. ------o------
From:
"Joseph" <inanna@e...>
Date: Fri Feb 14, 2003 1:51 am Subject: Re: An open letter to Nancy Lieder
Why do u assume that PX should be seen by the
naked eye by now? It is NOT a star with a bright and intense point of
light. It is a planet, giving off a
diffuse and dull glow. (take note diffuse and dull). At the distance it is at right now, farther away from Pluto, tell me, what does your common sense tell you? If we cant even see the giant planets Uranus and Neptune, and Pluto with the naked eye, and Px is still beyond Pluto, can u still assume that it should be seen by the naked eye by now? It can be seen by the naked eye once it reaches the orbit of Saturn in April, quite sensibly, as Saturn is the only outermost planet we can see with the naked eye. Oh and by the way, Px's speed increases exponentially as it approaches the outer fringes of the solar system, not at all constant as implied in your reasoning. ------o------ Suddenly TT members are astronomy experts based on Nancy's claims. Which I might add she admits is absolutely zero. Although there is no planet X visible to anyone anywhere except of course her own astronomy team.
|