"As far as I know, nobody moderates the #zetatalk channel.... Btw, the moderation scheme of the TT lists has been changed...."

Jan Rypdal
 

From: "Mike O'Hara" <ppplanet@a...>
Date: Mon May 12, 2003 3:06 am
Subject: Debunkers gone nuts

Gerard, the debunkers were NASTY last night, and Fluffycat came back in as
Foofy-something.

I could not +b him, because the status bar said the ban list was full, at least for me.

These people piss me off. Like Nancy says, they are not nice!

- Mike

------o------

From: Dave Orts <us_computerguy@y...>
Date: Mon May 12, 2003 6:47 pm
Subject: Re: [tt-watch] Re: Debunkers gone nuts

Question...

Are the moderators of this board the chat and the de-bunkers one-in-the-same?

I know had I been a debunker and posted something like this reply it would have never gotten up here.

Some of my political links are kept off... Fires seek to understand, then to be understood.

-DO

------o------

From: "Jan" <anybody@a...>
Date: Mon May 12, 2003 8:41 pm
Subject: Re: [tt-watch] Re: Debunkers gone nuts

No, they are not.

As far as I know, nobody moderates the #zetatalk channel except for the
Saturday night IRC chats with Nancy.

Btw, the moderation scheme of the TT lists has been changed, so that new
members cannot just sign up and post garbage as we have seen some times
lately, like the example you quoted.

Regards,
Jan

[Well, well, well long time no see. Although it shows how much Jan really knows, or should that be pretends to know. Obany, MikeO, J. William, Jeremy32 and Greb_B moderate the IRC chat. Basically saying whatever they want while kicking and banning anyone else. their own little private chat just like Jan on TT as you'll note by his final paragraph. TT-Watch is now on heavier moderation, but was changed some while back and he's only just got round to mentioning it because someone noticed. So much for the democracy Nancy mentioned.]

------o------

From: "txyall" <txyall@y...>
Date: Mon May 12, 2003 7:14 pm
Subject: Re: Debunkers gone nuts

No, I don't believe they are the same. The reason the posting was allowed is that they don't usually moderate someone's postings unless they become overly insulting and ranting, or continually spam the group. Unless it was very offensive, they usually warn them too. Regardless of what others may want you to believe, they don't moderate or ban inidividuals just because they don't share the group's views. However, I regularly question individuals about why they are subscribed and debate in a group that is not in line with their views.

But, I'm not a moderator. One of those guys might answer you specifically.

------o------

From: "txyall" <txyall@y...>
Date: Mon May 12, 2003 9:06 pm
Subject: Re: Debunkers gone nuts

Jan:

Thanks for the clarification and your good work.

Michael

[Talk about sucking-up, Txyall is after brownie points.]

------o------

From: "Mike O'Hara" <ppplanet@a...>
Date: Tue May 13, 2003 2:38 am
Subject: Call for permanent ban of Fluffycat from IRC

I want to solicit opinions regarding a permanent ban of Fluffycat and all his aliases from the IRC chatroom.

His behavior has grown from childish to vulgar to now evil, and is extremely disruptive to all goodhearted folk honestly seeking information about positive solutions to a pole shift.

My vote is for a permanent ban of Fluffy and all his aliases, and constant vigilance in this regard.

- Michael O'Hara

[I don't think Mike likes Fluffycat. Shame isn't it. Although you'd think he'd be more concerned with the absence of a 12th planet. After all that's what Zetatalk and its chat group is supposed to be about.]]

------o------

From: "Mike O'Hara" <ppplanet@a...>
Date: Tue May 13, 2003 4:09 am
Subject: RE: Call for permanent ban of Fluffycat from IRC

Says "Chris":

"with fluffy, it's mardi-gras all year 'round."

Thanks Chris for providing more evidence that Fluffy's days should be numbered.

[Once again dictatorship masquerading as democracy.]

------o------

 

Next