The Queen Is Back

A Die Hard With A Vengeance

From: "queenvee59" <queenvee59@h...>
Date: Tue Jun 3, 2003 9:35 pm
Subject: QueenVee’s SHIFT2003 Website is Back Online Again
 

*************************************************
QueenVee's SHIFT2003 Website is Back Online Again
*************************************************

I'm very pleased to report that my website (www.Shift2003.com) is now back online -- much to my surprise. This is all in thanks to the generosity of some faithful readers who anonymously donated funds to my server provider, Ralf Lenz, to cover his costs as outlined below. I am left speechless -- and extremely grateful -- for their gesture.

Readers may continue to reach me at queenvee@h... to suggest ways the site might be improved and/or suggest relevant news/articles for posting. Your supportive emails have convinced me that has been providing useful information at this time, and I will try and keep it going as long as there is interest.

Best,
QueenVee

------o------

From: "mrjralflenz" <jrl@u...>
Date: Wed Jun 4, 2003 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: QueenVee’s SHIFT2003 Website is Back Online Again

I would like to post some clarification to this, and explain the reason why the site went down in the first place, and why I decided to put it back online.

--- In tt-watch@yahoogroups.com, "queenvee59" <queenvee59@h...> wrote:
 I'm very pleased to report that my website (www.Shift2003.com) is  now back online -- much to my surprise. This is all in thanks to the generosity of some faithful readers who anonymously donated funds to my server provider, Ralf Lenz, to cover his costs as outlined below.  I am left speechless -- and extremely grateful -- for their gesture.
*remainder snipped for space*

First of all, of the people who donated money to cover this expense, less than $50 has come from QueenVee's readership. I would *NOT* have turned the site back on for $50.

The remaining $470 or so has come from the very individuals that certain members of this group have labeled debunkers/abusers/etc.

While I appreciate their contributions as I attempt to regain the over $2000 that the attacks on the ZetaTalk chat sessions in February/March have cost me (please note that I am a struggling 25-year-old attempting to get my own company to turn enough of a buck to quit my crappy retail sales job), the fact is that only 3 people that have actually used QV's site and the ZetaTalk chat sessions with an actual belief in the subject matter have been willing to donate.

I empathize with the many of you who have spent considerable amounts of resources on this scenario, only to be disappointed and left holding an empty bag. However, my situation is different: while I offered QV webspace as a friend, I have never supported ZetaTalk or any of its ideas and beliefs. I was attacked simply because I own an IRC server that Nancy & Co. HAPPENED to be using to run their chat sessions (without direct or implied invitation from me). Due to the fact that some people don't agree with the message ZetaTalk propagates, some nasty script kiddies DDoS'd most of the FunNet
servers (including mine) for several straight sessions in late February/early March. I have been made financially responsible for these attacks by my upstream bandwidth provider, when *I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM WHATSOEVER*. This is why I have asked for donations to help cover the cost.

I'm very, very disappointed in the number of actual users of the sites who have come to my aid in this time of need. I was nearly kicked out of my apartment for non-payment of rent, have had to pay $2000 in bandwidth overages and related charges, and all of this is simply because some people believe someone's thoughts and ideas.

It seems to me as though the only group of people with an actual willingness to help are those very people you all have turned into outcasts from your circle.

Donations are accepted via PayPal to jrl@u... I'm still $1540 short.

Regards,
- Ralf

jrl@u...
Owner/Member
USTCO/accessoryXpress, LLC.

------o------

From: "kyrienuvek" <kyrienuvek@n...>
Date: Sun Jun 8, 2003 8:56 pm
Subject: *What* is going on with the Chat rooms?!

Today I went to the Troubled_times chat room on IRC, and since nobody was there, I tried one of the other newer ones listed, the #poleshiftdiscussion one fo find people. Suddenly, without warning (or having said anything) I was closed out from the room. Logging back in to find out what happened and explain that I was a member of Troubled Times and had been going to the chat room, etc. I was coldly informed by somebody who called herself QueenVee that not only could I not join the room, but "please leave'! And she again closed me out from the room.

I understand that there have been hackers and whatnot on the room used for the Saturday chats, but *what* is going on? And why the need for such harshness and
rudeness? I've never felt such harshness before, or experienced anything close to what happened (I felt as though I'd been slapped!) when I logged into that room today!

Can someone please explain? I know I've mostly lurked on the message posts, but after what just happened, I was so confused and hurt I felt I had to say something to find out more about this.

[Be thankful she didn't let you in, otherwise you'd have spent your time kissing arse and sucking up to "her majesty" like the rest of the drones that frequent her chat group, but then just as with the rest of the insect kingdom the drones that service the queen are also pretty much dickless wonders and "hers" are no different. And don't bother holding you're breath as the 12th planet will probably have come, gone and be well on its way again by the time Victoria gets around to replying.]

------o------

 
From: "brenfree2003" <brenfree@e...>
Date: Mon Jun 9, 2003 2:56 am
Subject: Re: *What* is going on with the Chat rooms?!

That chat room is not a specific "Troubled Times" chat room, however, Queenve is a valued member of the group - either she was worried about hackers, or there was a private chat going on, and you just showed up at the wrong time! These things happen...she will probably respond to your message.

Brent

[Valued member? So a person who openly challenges Nancy's credibility on the IRC, then betrays her trust by posting private e-mails on her web, discredits Nancy's validity of the Kid A picture, then does the same with the Mount Wilson pictures, is a valued member of TT? I'd hate to see your idea of a debunker then.]
 

Next