No Planet X


 

 Jan - the new debunker

(Part Two)

 

"By pretending Nancy made up these ZetaTalk messages herself you are clearly out of line, seriously damaging the ZetaTalk message. Step down, or get lost! "

 

"Any employee, officer in an organization etc. going for another person like you are with Nancy on the Hazelton issue shows a clear lack of loyalty to the organization and a clear lack of understanding how to work within an organization. Such discussion NEVER belong to the public room, they are to be kept internal. Your wording has been unprofessional and clear personal attacks. I think you are making this too easy. I see no need to call for your dismissal, as it will be a given unless you step down and behave like any officer of an organization should."
Jan, Internal Auditor

 (Nov 2001) In reply to Sol incident

 

 

Continuing the saga, after Jan's post Nancy arrived and attacked his comments. Obviously not best pleased with her young Padaone.

 

From: "nancylieder" <zetatalk@z...>
Date: Sat Jul 19, 2003 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: ZetaTalk credibility - time to move on?

In 1995 ZetaTalk AND ONLY ZetaTalk stated that 2003 would see the arrival of Planet X, inbound from Orion/Taurus location which was given as specific coordinates in 1997.

[But there is no Planet X Nancy, prediction failed.]

This all happened.

[No it hasn't.]

They described in 1995 the weather changes, quake uptick, and consistent coverup to be expected.

[And so have the conservationists, scientists and other various concerned groups, but none of them mention Planet X or Zetas.]

The red dust is now upon us, the photos from around the world showing without question the arrival of Planet X, and the matching appearance on SOHO images leaving any question moot.

[What Red dust? Where is it reported? Show us one credible source.]

 Does this show ZetaTalk Accuracy? I think it does.

[And I think it does not.]

The Fat Lady has not Sung in Iraq? Oh, heavens' throw it all out the window then as ZetaTalk now has no worth! Was any date given for this Fat Lady to Sing? No.
[A vague statement twisted and turned to suit her own ends proves what exactly? That Nancy can manipulate a situation at best that she got a fifty, fifty guess right at worst.]
Missed the May 15 date?

[Yes.]

What was said in Nov 2001, that NO date would be given because the establishment would use it to entrap and enslave the populace.

[Now where in Nov 2001 did she make this statement exactly? I can't find it. Although one must ask that if no date were to be given as from Nov 2001 why did Nancy then release a set of indicator dates early in 2003? Sort of contradicts what she is now claiming she already knew two years previously.]

What happened? Operation TOPOFF on May 12 and after a date of May 20 was given on the Lou Gentile hour on May 16, Homeland security promptly went to level Orange and held there for two weeks, for NO reason other than ZetaTalk.

[A solitary US engagement that should have concluded with bridges blown up and populous imprisoned, as the elite did not know the Zetas were lying about their date. That's if we are to believe the Zetas "Great White Lie."]

Did this show ZetaTalk accuracy? You bet it did.

[No it did not. It did piss off a lot of your followers and believers though.]

The information WAS used to attempt to enslave and entrap the populace, and the coverup rock firm.

See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta16.htm for Synergy of Signs
See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/z03.htm for What's New
See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/reddust.htm for Red Moon/Dust
See http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/tteam342.htm for Recent Photos
See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/global.htm for Global Quakes

See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/psdate.htm for Elite Reactions
See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/psdate0.htm for May 15 ZetaTalk
See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/psdate1.htm for May 27 ZetaTalk
See http://www.zetatalk.com/index/psdate2.htm for White Lie Rationale

In all this, what has Jan's Accuracy been? He is bleating that ZeatTalk should be discounted, knifed in the back, trashed, because it has not proved to be 100% accurate in his opinion. Well thank goodness the world has Jan and his accuracy as a guide! Lets look at HIS track record, and anyone else bleating about too, what is THEIR track record?

[Oh dear now its finally Jan's turn to feel her wrath. (I could care less.) But this is pretty tame stuff compared to Nancy's usual attacks. Maybe she'll get better once she begins to stew on it a bit.]

Now that we have the photos, the SOHO, bearing out that the inbound Planet X complex being imaged in the Fall of 2002 which grew LARGER during the imaging season and BECAME the objects being photographed today, we can look at Jan's accuracy last Fall. Quote:

`I have been analyzing all the available sets of images so far. In the first set, I was the one identifying and defending the found spots. (I had of course no means to verify it being Planet X or anything else, only that there seemed to be something there, which I also stated at the time.)'

`However, closer examination revealed that each object only turned up on a single image. I therefore wanted to verify the findings by doing longer exposures, so that they should turn up on more images. Steve complied with my wish, and did 5 minutes exposures the next time. Unfortunately, we still had the spots turning up on single images only.'

`I do not believe the images as such are suspect in any way. Nor do I believe they prove or disprove anything yet.'

Regards, Jan'

Nov 5, 2002
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tt-watch/message/11433

 

[SOHO pictures? Wish she'd make up her mind. First they're using SOHO to cover-up and doctor images, then it's supposed to have been disabled so no one can see Planet X and now she's using its images to confirm her delusion.]
And for those moaning that it is time to move on, well why are you HERE bleating and moaning? Just move on. Don't stand about, bleating.

[I guess she means Jan.]

------o------

 

From: "Jan" <anybody@a...>
Date: Sun Jul 20, 2003 12:27 pm
Subject: Re: [tt-watch] ZetaTalk credibility - time to move on?

Nancy,

It's always difficult to know if you read and/or understood the posting to which you answer. One thing is for sure though, you will always try to go personal.

[This is rich, Jan always uses the "personal" angle, yet if one examines his own words carefully you will see he attacks personally but very indirectly. Check out his original post on this thread that sparked the attack. You'll see he's having a go directly at Nancy but in a very clever and sly way.]

However, I fail to see what's wrong with my sci.astro posting of November 5 last year. Maybe you did not understand it?

Hot pixels that show up only on individual frames, especially when doing long
exposures, are noise and nothing but noise. For Planet X to be verified, the pixels would have to show up on all, or at least the majority of the images taken. Therefore, my statement at the time was the same as now, but with other words; there is no evidence of Planet X on any of the image sets I have analyzed. This btw includes all the recent lens flares and other anomalies posted on ZetaTalk. When I stated in November that the images were not suspect, that meant they were not manipulated.

I have never claimed any telepathic communication with Zetas or any other aliens, nor have I ever made any predictions about Planet X or a pending pole shift. I only analyze the information given, and draw my conclusions based on my own research and intellect. My position on the background information in ZetaTalk is the same as it has always been, but it should have been obvious to everybody that the sightings and imaging starting in the autumn of 2002 has not produced one single shred of evidence for Planet X. I tried to point this out to you in private e-mails, was lied to under ZetaTalk(TM), and after that, I kept a low profile.

[Scared she might bite your arse or that the membership might turn against you? I know where my money is going.]

Contrary to your style, I do not believe in advertising our differences to the world, nor do I ever need to go personal, as I always let the facts speak for themselves.

[Not personal? He's just posted a personal opinion that Nancy and the Zetas are more or less rubbish, told Nancy she doesn't listen, that she lies and "limelights" and none of that is personal? See how he works?]

Whatever the rationale, I hate being lied to.

[There it is again. Note how he pushes the word "lie?"]

As I've been suspicious of the imaging and sightings for a while, I did no drastic, irreversible moves in May, nor did I wait out the pole shift in a trench.

[Personal with sarcasm now, deliberately ridiculing Nancy's prediction by resorting to inference of her own words.]

I have however received e-mails from people that had relocated, waiting for the pole shift in their tents or vehicles, having to re-start their normal lives after the failed predictions. Whether one is to accept the premise of a White Lie staged by the Zetas or not, I cannot accept fooling people the way it was done, nor the current attempts to drag it out week by week.

[Once again "fooling" is another twist on the word lie.]

The lack of 100% accuracy is not any subjective view on my part. As you may have seen here on TT Watch, most people try to trash me for still giving
ZetaTalk the benefit of doubt, and I have yet to see anybody following you on your accuracy claims.

[Again this is rich as many have been banned by Jan for pointing out this very fact to the tt-membership. Yet he does it with impunity.]

The ZetaTalk "What's New - Signs of the Times" and "Slowing Rotation Countdown" pages contains highly speculative, non-confirmed information of such a low quality and credibility that it seems a deliberate attempt to discredit ZetaTalk completely once and for all. Contrary to your claims, there is no observable rotation slowdown, there is no second sun (if observed or imaged correctly), there is no red dust etc. While most people had problems relating to the imaging claims, they can just look outside and see for themselves that these claims are not correct.

[Again how many have been banned and moderated only recently for saying as much. Yet here he stands "Head" moderator of the tt-groups pontificating and arguing with Nancy, could anyone else do that?]

Given my own previous position on ZetaTalk, my own research (i.e. reading up on other's research), my posting was in fact an attempt to balance the all negative attitude against ZetaTalk. Maybe you rather wanted I kept quiet in embarrassment as most others, or turn completely against you? Then it would maybe be easier to just dismiss my posting and viewpoints?

[This is in reference to the other TT-INC officers now moderating on the groups. Apart from clamping down on free speech they have said little of their own belief.]

It will be interesting to see if you can find anything more compromising on my behalf in response. As I am now off to the airport, the playground is yours.

Regards,
Jan

[Yes we'll see Jan and if this goes as usual then Nancy will begin a concerted effort to discredit you. Posting time after time as many negative comments you've made in the past for all the membership to see and I for one will love every painstaking minute should that happen. As the shoe is firmly and rightly placed on the other foot. Perhaps you'll finally feel what those other poor souls experienced when you and Nancy turned your evil attention and vicious true nature against them. Could your days be numbered? One can only hope so.  At least you'll have gone out with a bang rather than a whimper.]

------o------

 

http://website.lineone.net/~brian_gillbanks/hazelwoodsaga2.htm

 

Nov 2001:

"I would say that the main problems here are: That one of the TT officers are showing such lack of understanding in the main ZetaTalk message on STO and STS behavior, and That said TT officer attacks another TT officer & VP in public. In any ordinary organization, I would call for an immediate dismissal of that officer from any duties within the organization. This not being an ordinary organization, and our message being one of education (not only on the Pole Shift, but more so on the Awakening), I would hope this TT Officer immediately brings forward a public excuse to Nancy, and refrains from any such postings in the future."
 

http://website.lineone.net/~brian_gillbanks/hazelwoodsaga3.htm

 

"By pretending Nancy made up these ZetaTalk messages herself you are clearly out of line, seriously damaging the ZetaTalk message. Step down, or get lost! "

"Any employee, officer in an organization etc. going for another person like you are with Nancy on the Hazelton issue shows a clear lack of loyalty to the organization and a clear lack of understanding how to work within an organization. Such discussion NEVER belong to the public room, they are to be kept internal. Your wording has been unprofessional and clear personal attacks. I think you are making this too easy. I see no need to call for your dismissal, as it will be a given unless you step down and behave like any officer of an organization should."

 

http://website.lineone.net/~brian_gillbanks/tttakeover1.htm

 

"Lately, we have had Laura McDonald calling JosX a disruptor because he questioned the Posse, and stating that she's "Glad you're here Michael" to our infamous disruptor. A few months ago she also got into a heated debate on TT Watch about STO or STS, implants etc. where she clearly showed she did not understand the TT premises."

"George Ganter recently stated that "Michael is a skeptic, but he is a skeptic with serious equipment and astronomical knowledge. He has searched for Planet X at the Zetas' coordinates on several occasions along with numerous other amateur astronomers who he engaged in the effort [...]", even though Michael himself has stated that he will not search for Planet X until the Zetas say it can be seen in amateur telescopes. George also mentioned Sol, who stepped down from the TT Board a few months ago due to his inappropriate behavior in attacking another TT officer, namely Nancy. The TT Posse as it currently operates seems to quietly encourage attacks on Nancy or her "followers" to the level where the TT Watch list is losing its focus. Given the current state of the TT Posse, I hereby call for the dismissal of this group as the TT list moderators, to be replaced by an appointed officer acting as the primary TT List Moderator. For this position, I would like to nominate Clipper. (I do know that Clipper will be unavailable for much of this summer, but still think he is the right man for this position.)"

------o------

 
(Don't you just love it when the elitist, hypocrites turn on one another?)

Next