North Mymms
District Green Belt Society
2006
Updated
21-May-07...............
ญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Newsletter
February 2006. Click here for a copy
John
Prescott. In the Cabinet shuffle on
Adam
Smith Institute – Land economy.
This paper was issued in April 2006 – see www.adamsmith.org. It proposes the abolition of the planning
process and Green Belts. Instead there
would be restrictive covenants and legal actions taken under nuisance
laws. The report has been condemned by
the CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) and the RTPI (Royal Town Planning
Institute). The RTPI slammed the report
saying that the marketised (sic) approach to planning in the 1980s did not
work. The planning system delivers a
quality environment for the majority of people. If people had to resort to
legal action, most people would be unable to afford to object to developments. The CPRE said that more homes are being built
because of the system criticized in the report.
‘The way to re-green
See LGBC Notes June 2006 for greater
detail.
East
of
A sure indicator of the strength of
local feelings was that we received over 650 responses to our September
Newsletter from almost every road in
The NM Green Belt Soc handover
picture shows Cllr Mandy Perkins, committee member Mike Willis, secretary Bob Horrocks, Grant Shapps MP, President Gary Mabbutt, chairman Claire Taylor, and immediate past President Bob Wilson. Bob
Wilson had been our president since 1982 and a keen supporter of our
activities. He sold his house this
summer and is still living locally for the time being. He especially asked to be included in the
delegation even though he has now stood down as our president.
Our new Gary Mabbutt is a resident of

Public
meeting
This Society held a public meeting on Monday 2
October which was attended by about 95 local residents. Our
chairman, Claire Taylor, introduced Hertfordshire County Councillor Bill Storey
who explained how the overall planning system had changed in recent years, with
individual county structure plans being replaced by regional plans such as the
East of England Plan. Cllr Storey then spoke
about the region-wide problems of existing water shortages, the sewerage system
for the county, jobs, and roads.
He
noted that the East Coast Main Line could not handle any greater volume of
trains unless the Digswell viaduct was widened, but previous proposals to do so
had been abandoned and the necessary land disposed off. Equally the railway line to Stansted would
have problems in handling more traffic on that side of the county. Adding more
carriages to trains would bring different problems.
Bob
Horrocks, the Society’s secretary, then summarised the Inspectors reasons
why Welwyn Garden City and Hatfield were ideal for expansion. These included
job expansion caused by the university and planned health campus, plus the good
transport links to
The
inspectors did add caveats about water, sewerage, transport, etc. and the
funding of their provision.
The
meeting concluded with a lively question time
Click here
for a copy of the main points made by Bob Horrocks expanding on what was given
in a handout to those attending the meeting.
The Enquiry in Public has been
completed and the Report sent to Ruth Kelly MP, Minister for Communities and
Local Government.
The Report is 250 pages long. The worst recommendation for us is a
recommendation to increase the number of homes in Welwyn Hatfield from 5,800 to
10,000 in the period 2001 to 2021.
Welwyn Hatfield Council have issued a News Item which says:
‘Welwyn
Garden City and Hatfield have been targeted for new housing and employment
development in the Panel report into the East of England Plan. If the recommendations
in the report are accepted by the government this will mean substantial new
development in the Green Belt in Welwyn Hatfield.
The independent panel’s
report of the Examination in Public into the East of England Plan has just been
published. It recommends that Welwyn Hatfield’s housing allocation from
2001 to 2021 should rise from 5,800 proposed in the draft plan to 10,000
dwellings and that Welwyn Garden City and Hatfield should become Key Centres
for Development and Change. In addition it recommends the development of new
employment sites within the borough. This will mean approximately 190 ha (470
acres) will need to be released from the Green Belt in Welwyn Hatfield alone
– an area equivalent to the built-up area of the Hatfield Aerodrome
site. The Report also recommends that the Green Belt should be reviewed
to meet strategic needs up to 2031. If the same rate of growth in housing
is applied up to 2031, we estimate that this could require a further 250 ha
(620 acres) of Green Belt land to be released.
Councillor Mandy Perkins, Executive Member for Planning said: “I am very
concerned about the implications of the increased scale of development
recommended by the Panel for Welwyn Hatfield. I am also alarmed that
these proposals have emerged very late in the day, which means they have not
been properly tested or subject to public scrutiny.”
Central Government is currently considering the Panel’s report and will
put together a series of alterations to the East of England Plan known as the
‘Proposed Changes’, which are expected to be published in November.
There will then be a period of public consultation at which time the Council
and members of the public will have the opportunity to make
representations.’
Actions, appeals and
planning applications in 2006, in alphabetical order of street name
2006/283.
2006/284. Raybrook Farm,
2006/1144. Little Tollgate,
2006/243, White Lodge Farm, Bulls
Lane, Bell Bar. The application is to erect stables, hay store, tack room & form
menage with paddock. We have
objected as inappropriate in the Green Belt and inconsistent with the existing
approval for a fishing lake etc. Permission refused 24.4.06
2003/1623.
2006/475.
High Dene,
2006/311. Marshmoor Cottage,
1`20/2004. Rookery Cafe,
2005/0625 Friday Grove,
The site is within the
Metropolitan Green Belt wherein permission will only be given for erection of
new buildings or the use of existing buildings or land for agricultural, other
essential purposes appropriate to a rural area or small scale facilities for
participatory sport or recreation. The proposal constitutes inappropriate
development in the Green Belt. The built form of the proposed dwelling would
have a strong visual presence and would result in an unacceptable loss of
openness and harm to the rural character of surrounding Green Belt land and
would represent encroachment into the countryside in a vulnerable location. No
very special circumstances have been demonstrated of sufficient weight to set
aside Green Belt policies of restraint.
An appeal has been lodged, just within
the 6 months deadline, which will be decided at a Public Inquiry, to be held
sometime in 2007. We have written to the
Planning Inspectorate setting out our responses to the Grounds for appeal, and
said we may wish to speak at the Public Inquiry which will be held some time in
2007. The CPRE-Herts Soc has also
written to the Planning Inspectorate in response to the Grounds of Appeal.
2006/210 Tanum Farm,
2006/1250.
2006/0187 The Cottage,
2006/362. Mymwood Cottage,
2006/780. Well House,
2006/1015.
2006/760. 172 Travellers Lane, Welham Green. Removal of restriction on hours to allow
24-hour operation. We objected as
reduced amenity locally. Application
refused by the Council on 28.7.06 on the same grounds being close to Pooleys
Lane houses.
The Old Kennels, Welham
Manor, off Dixons Hill Road, Welham Green.
This site of about 1 acre was auctioned on 21 Feb 2006.The sales
particulars quoted obsolete information giving a more favourable impression of
development potential than is the case.
We notified the auctioneer and he then circulated a copy of the planning
appeal report in 2005 dismissing an application for 9 houses on this site. The particulars had quoted from a 2003 appeal
which was also dismissed but was more favourable. The bids failed to reach the reserve price
and the land was subsequently sold. We
understand that the use is unlikely to change.
1360/2005. Unit 3 Woodside Lane, Bell Bar. Parking for up to 15 buses and coaches. We objected on grounds of reduced amenity
for neighbours. Permission granted 31.7.06 but with
restricted hours for starting and running engines, and no repairs etc to be
done outside the building. In October
2006 an application was made for a Goods Vehicle Licence to operate a goods
vehicle from this site. We wrote to the
Traffic Commissioner pointing out that this would not seem to comply with
planning restrictions on the site. The
application was withdrawn and the applicant has now sought a licence for
premises in Welwyn Garden City.