THE LONDON GREEN BELT COUNCIL                               Minutes 367-372

 

Minutes of the Meeting held in the Boothroyd Room, Portcullis House, 30 March 2006

 

Present           Mrs T Villiers MP,  President

                        Mr R Smith, Vice-President  (Potters Bar Society)

                        Mr T Simpson, Chairman (Elstree & Borehamwood G B Soc.)

                        Mr L Holt (Secretary) (Chislehurst Society)

                        Mr S Smith, Treasurer (Enfield Preservation Society)

                        Mrs G Oliver, Assistant Secretary (East Barnet Parish Residents Association)

 

Mr R Liffen, Carshalton-on-the-Hill Residents Association

Mrs J Habib, Chiltern Society

Mr C Hancock, CPRE London

Mr M Hope, Croydon Society

Mr G Myers, Croydon Society

Mr P Jeffryes, Denham Parish Council

Mr P Barker, East Coulsdon Residents Association

Mr R Atkinson, Elstree & Borehamwood G B Society

Mr A Walker, Epping Society

Mr D Favre, Epping Society

Mr L Bull, Friern Barnet & Whetstone Residents Assoc.

Mr H Bitten, Friends of Epping Forest

Mrs A Swinson, Hatch End Association

 

 

Mr D Price, Hatch End Association

Mr H Davidson, Headstone Residents

Mr P Daymond, Ickenham Residents Association

Mr C Hoptroff, Leighton Buzzard Society

Miss M Dewing, Mill Hill Preservation Society

Mr R Parsons, North Uxbridge Residents Association

Mr C Beney, Open Spaces Society

Mr G Butler, Ramblers Association, Surrey Area

Mr P Rogers, Sevenoaks Society

Miss C Pudsey, St Albans Community Forest Assoc.

Mr G  Quantock, South Ruislip Residents Association

Mr G Belsman, Stanmore Society

Mr K St Pier, Tewin Society

 

Apologies for Absence  Brindles Wood Residents Association, CPRE Surrey, Kent Federation of Amenity Societies, Oak Farm Residents Association, Old Coulsdon Residents Association, Pembury Society, Pinner Association,

 

Matters arising from previous minutes

 

265(1)   Belmont Riding School, Mill Hill Mrs Oliver reported that the saga continues.  The proposal to restore the old house, build 15 new houses extending into the Green Belt, and divide the 40 acres of grazing land associated with the riding school among the new house owners has not met with the Council’s approval.  The Council has suggested that the applicants should make further efforts to sell the property as it stands.  The house and the 40 acres have put up for sale at a price of £6.7 million.  Such a price would only make sense if the land had planning permission for housing, which it does not.  Mrs Oliver was concerned that there would be no offers at this price and the applicants would go back to the Council saying that the property was unmarketable and resurrecting their original proposal.

 

347(4)   Sale of field strips in Green Belt  The Chairman said that sale of Green Belt land in small plots was stiil an issue in his area.  The President said she would consult Oliver Heald MP for an update on the progress of his campaign on the subject. Mrs Oliver said that she had been told by Mr Maurice that a stall at the Ideal Home Exhibition selling plots had been shut down by the DTI for misrepresenting the situation.  Mr Daymond said that it had emerged that a field near Ickenham, leased by a farmer from a bank, had been in divided ownership for 20 – 30 years.  He added that in another case, an Article 4 direction had effectively prevented division.   Miss Pudsey had responded to an advertisement, expressing interest in a land bank scheme.  In this case, plots were not fenced off individually; instead investors acquired shares in the whole property.

 

353       50th Birthday celebrations  The Chairman will liaise with Mrs Habib and Mr Liffen.

 

355(4)   Green Arcs       The statement in AGM minutes, that Mr Bitten’s worries about the Green Arcs appear to have been unnecessary, overstated the case.  He still had concerns that promotion of the Green Arcs would draw attention from the serious incursions into Green Belt proposed to the north-east of London.  Members agreed that they should do everything they could to prevent confusion in the public mind between Green Arcs and the Green Belt.  Nevertheless, the Green Arc proposals do present opportunities to bring derelict and other land (whether Green Belt or not) into use as open space for recreation.  Miss Pudsey thought Green Arcs would be a useful additional weapon, like Community Forests, with which to oppose unsuitable development.

            It was noted that, to add to possible confusion, there were, in different planning contexts, Green grids and Green chains.  Mr Myers observed that these designations crossed boundaries between local authorities and would avoid some of the anomalies that can arise on boundaries with Green Belt which is defined by individual authorities.

            Members were not able to respond to the Secretary’s query on how Green Arcs were being treated in the new Local Development Frameworks.  He added that as far as Green Belt is concerned, authorities seemed frequently to take over wording from the preceding plan.  This should not present a problem.

 

363(2)   East of England Plan     The Examination in Public of the draft Plan has been going on over the winter.  Mrs Oliver attended on the day the Green Belt was dealt with.  It was a long day and the Green Belt came near the end. There was not a lot of discussion but the point did come across that if Green Belt was lost and other land designated in its place, the land designated had to have an appropriate relationship to the land lost. Mrs Habib wondered whether the water shortage in the south east had been referred to.  The President said this was one of the bases on which she had objected to the Government’s housing proposals.

 

Item 367 Treasurer’s report              The Treasurer said that about two-thirds of the subscriptions had come in and he would follow up the rest.  Membership stands at 126, a little lower than in previous years; seven names were removed for non-payment at the end of 2004 and two new members have joined.  At the beginning of the year the funds stood at £7,810 and are now £7,979.  Expenses paid amounted to £860, including £320 for the hire of The Abbey Community Centre for the AGM.

 

Item 368  President’s Report            The President congratulated LGBC on its work and said that she strongly supported the Green Belt.  She wanted the focus to be on redeveloping previously developed sites and reforming the planning system to ensure more local participation in decisions.  She wanted to reduce the number of empty houses and do more for first time buyers by promoting shared ownership.  Nothing that George Osborne had said should be construed as weakening her party’s support for the Green Belt.

 

Item 369  Appointments       

 

1.       Vice Chairman                         The Chairman stressed the need to elect a Vice-Chairman.  He invited anyone who would consider taking on the job to contact him (020 8953 3421 or Simpages@hotmail.com)

2.       Assistant Secretary       Mr Quantock was appointed as Assistant Secretary to cover the north west of London

3.       Education Liaison Officer          The Chairman introduced Mr Bob Atkinson of the Elstree & Borehamwood Green Belt Society.  Mr Atkinson explained that his Society had been concerned by its aging membership and that fact that people only became aware of Green Belt issues when a particular development threatened them – by which time it was too late to do anything about it.  They had decided to approach schools to see whether they could get pupils interested young.  They have three schools involved, two with year six pupils and the other with the whole primary school.  The local Rotary Club have given their support and will donate a prize for the best school project.  It was hoped to produce a Powerpoint package on CD for all schools to take advantage of.  The Chairman proposed that Mr Atkinson be appointed LGBC’s Education Liaison Officer and this was agreed.  Members can contact Mr Atkinson at ackyboy@fsmail.net .

 

Item 370 Barker Review of Housing Provision   The Chairman referred to the current reconsideration of Kate Barker’s Review and said that one problem was that there are some 800,000 empty houses and requested members to lobby their MPs about it.  He thought the Housing Associations were not sufficiently accountable on the issue Mrs Habib added that the Government set rents on Council Houses at levels which did not allow Councils to maintain them properly.  The President said that she wanted to see more control for local councils.   Mr Butler considered that another factor contributing to overcrowding in the South east was that immigrants all wanted to locate there rather than spreading out all over the country.

 

 

Item 371 Officers’ reports on new business since the last meeting

                    

1.       The Chairman reported that it had been a busy period and thanked the Vice President, Secretary and Mr Hoptroff for their assistance.   The Chairman said that thanks were also due to CPRE who had attended throughout the Examination in Public of the draft Plan and circulated reports. 

 

2.      The Chairman said that the LGBC website was difficult to find using search engines.  At present it is part of the North Mymms District Green Belt Society website and he felt it would be better if we had our own site.  Mr Beney agreed.  He offered to help set one up if someone was prepared to commit the time to maintaining it.  Mr Hoptroff observed that LGBC did have its own domain name (www.londongreenbeltcouncil.org.uk) and was not convinced that having a separate site would make LGBC any more visible to search engines.  He suggested that members should include a reference to the LGBC website address on their websites.  They can also be included their website’s address on a part of the LGBC site containing links to members’ websites.  At present this is seriously underpopulated.  With more cross referencing, search engines would give the LGBC and members’ sites more prominence.

 

3.       The Secretary said that it had been a relatively quite period for him.  He had

(i)                  objected to a application for residential/travellers accommodation at Honeywood Lane, West Kingsdown.  The application was refused, as had all similar applications lodged with Sevenoaks Council.

(ii)                objected to a rail freight interchange application at Moat Lane, Slade Green

(iii)               responded to questionnaires etc. relating to Framework Papers from a number of Councils

(iv)              corresponded with Thurrock Development Corporation about various developments.

 

4.       The Vice-President drew attention to an article by Graeme Bell, Vice-Chairman of the Town and Country Planning Association in the RTPI magazine ‘Planning’ on 24 March, arguing, yet again, that Green Belts are outdated and should be replaced by some other policy. [I undertook at the meeting to précis the article in these minutes but have found in practice that it is impossible to do so – underlining the fact that it has no coherent argument; just a series of non-sequiturs based on unsubstantiated assertions. - C.H.]  The Chairman said he would write to Planning with a rebuttal.  The Magazine’s address for correspondence is 74 Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7JP.

 

5.       Mrs Oliver reported that outline permission had been given for a new hospital building and housing at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital in Stanmore.  Mr Beney pointed out that London Loop long distance footpath passes alongside the hospital. It is very narrow.  When the full planning application is determined, this route needs to be kept as a green way and preferably a Section 106 agreement should be sought to widen it.

 

 

Item 372  Other matters raised by members

 

1.                Mr Liffen sought clarification of how to respond to consultation papers on behalf of LGBC where questionnaires were provided which seemed inappropriate, for example where LGBC considered the assumptions or whole philosophy behind a question were wrong.  The Secretary said that it would be obvious from our title that the focus of our interest was the Green Belt and it was appropriate to make the relevant points.  It was agreed that a questionnaire must not be allowed to be a straitjacket; if the view we wish to express does not fit into the questions then appropriate text should be added.

 

2.                Mr Liffen reported that, on a recent appeal, the local Residents Association had wished to make points backed by the UDP but the inspector stopped them on the grounds that the UDP had been superseded by the Mayor of London’s Plan.  Other decisions had now shown this to be a wrong approach and the Association was asking the Deputy Prime Minister to overrule the inspector’s decision.

 

3.                Following a discussion between the Secretary and Mr Liffen about who was to look after cases arising in Surrey, Mr Myers suggested that it was more appropriate for LGBC to concentrate on broader policy and lobbying the Government on Green Belt issues, leaving individual cases to the local members.  Miss Dewing said that there had been several major problems in the Mill Hill area where LGBC support had been invaluable.  It was agreed LGBC must cover the broad issues but that flexibility was required on individual cases.  LGBC should not unnecessarily duplicate the work of members but would stand ready to add its voice on individual cases where members thought this would be effective.

 

4.                Mrs Swinson reported that there is concern that the RAF is intending to sell Bentley Priory to developers.  The site is of importance in the history of the Battle of Britain and the Chairman considered that it should be dedicated to the memory of “The Few”.

 

5.                Miss Pudsey said that there were proposals for a rail freight interchange at Radlett Aerodrome providing some 3000 jobs.  There were concerns about the traffic implications in the surrounding area.  The Secretary asked whether the site was designated as a Major Developed Site in the Local Plan.  Miss Pudsey thought not (the current Local Plan is unusually long in the tooth).  She thought the site was designated for recreation.

 

THE DATE OF THE NEXT MEETING   It is intended to hold the next meeting in July 2006.  The date will be announced in due course. 

 

N.B. Don’t forget to lobby your MP to get Bentley Priory preserved as a memorial to The Few.