THE
Minutes of the meeting held in the Grimmond Room, Portcullis
House,
Present Mrs
T Villiers MP, President
Mr R Smith, Vice-President (Potters Bar
Society)
Mr T Simpson, Chairman (Elstree
& Borehamwood G B Soc.)
Mr C Hoptroff,
Vice-Chairman (Leighton Buzzard Society)
Mr L Holt, Secretary (Chislehurst
Society)
Mrs J Habib, Treasurer (Chiltern
Society)
Mr R Liffen, Assistant
Secretary (Carshalton-on-the-Hill Residents Association)
|
Mr D
Ellis, Barnet Society Mr P
Miner, CPRE National Office Mr S
Smith, Mr A
Walker, Epping Society Mr H
Bitten, Friends of Epping Forest & CPREssex Mr C
Beney, Open Spaces Society Mr M
Maurice, Pinner Society |
Mr D
Slater, Radlett Society and Green Belt Association Mr P
Rogers, Sevenoaks Society Mrs M
Raymond, Stanmore Society Mr J
Archer, Youth Hostels Association (South Region) |
Apologies for Absence Mr R
Atkinson (Education Officer), Brindles Wood Residents Association, Denham
Parish Council, East Barnet Parish Residents Association, East Coulsdon
Residents Association, Harefield Residents Association, Hatch End Association,
Mill Hill Preservation Society, Mill Hill Residents Association, Old Coulsdon
Residents Association and Otford Parish Council.
Matters arising from previous
minutes
353 50th
Brithday celebrations The
Chairman thanked Mrs Habib and Mr Liffen for organising the reception. He
regretted that there had not been more press coverage; it was unfortunate that
we did not have a really good ‘angle’ for the press to get hold of. He felt that the catering had been expensive
for what was provided and the President agreed that House of Commons catering
was not cheap. It was also suggested that name badges would have been useful.
About 5 of the 37 participants were invitees, the rest representatives of
member organisations.
Mr
Liffen had produced a 15 minute video of the event, including the speeches. It
was agreed that a showing should be put on the agenda of the next LGBC meeting.
363(2) East of
369(3) Education The
Chairman reported that the CD Rom for year 6 pupils was ready and Mr Atkinson
was in the process of converting it to PDF format. Mrs Raymond said she was involved with the
Harrow Agenda 21 education group and was keen for their schools to use the
CD. Mr Ellis said that it would also be
useful for ‘Learning through Landscapes’, a charity working for better outdoor
environments in education. Mrs Habib
said that the Chiltern ANOB Consultation Board was also doing education work.
371(2) LGBC Website Mr
R Smith asked what was meant by the comment in the last minutes that
improvements were “about as much as could be done with the present
arrangements”. Mr Beney replied that it
was as much as the person maintaining the website could do. However, if LGBC wanted any other items put
on the website we only had to ask; it probably could be done. The Chairman will
liaise with Mr Horrocks and Mr Gordon.
372(4) Bentley Priory Mrs Raymond reported that Harrow Council had
published plans for Bentley Priory for public consultation. The Stanmore Society was broadly in favour of
the plans but had concerns over whether the developers would follow the plans
and the fact that no height limit for the development was specified. The Chairman agreed that the plan was much
better than he had feared. He added that
ideally the old building would make an excellent repository for the RAF
archives currently at Hendon. In response to a question from Mr Maurice, Mrs
Raymond said that the proposed development was confined to the footprint of the
existing buildings.
Mr Beney said
that development on the old Marconi site seemed to have gone beyond the
footprint and this was confirmed by Mrs Raymond. It will be necessary to keep a close eye on
Bentley Priory.
372(5) Rail Freight Interchange of Radlett Aerodrome Mr
Slater reported that this proposal had been refused and the Chairman added that
he understood that it was going to appeal.
Item 383 President’s Remarks
The
President congratulated all concerned on the Reception. She said it was important to keep up the
fight over the East of England Plan; the intensity of development envisaged by
the Government was alarming. In her
correspondence with Yvette Cooper, the Government continued to maintain support
for the Green Belt. Nevertheless, they
still wished to give more power to regional planning bodies with an
encouragement to reassess Green Belt.
Mrs Habib was concerned by the suggestion in the Barker
Report that, if an option inconsistent with the Green Belt yielded a better
economic result than an option consistent with the policy, then the former
should prevail. How, she asked, could
one put a price on fresh air and open space?
The President agreed and said that she hoped to raise the issue in the
House. Mr Slater also pointed out that
Kate Baker’s terms of reference specifically excluded environmental questions
and this was expressed in the report. Mr
Ellis found it amazing that the report did not consider environmental issues. He said, for example, that the loss of
agricultural land was not considered a bar to development but, with each 1oC
rise in average temperature likely to reduce global food production by 10%,
this land would become vital in the future.
The President said, in response to a
question from Mr Rogers that she did not know when the Government response to
the Barker Report would be issued.
Item 384 Election of Vice-President
On a
proposal from the chair, it was unanimously agreed that Mr David Gauke, MP for
SW Hertfordshire should be put forward as a Vice-President. Many of his constituents live in Green Belt
areas and he has a strong interest in Green Belt issues.
Item 385 Treasurer’s Report
The
Treasurer reported that 93 members have paid up for the year; 25 subscriptions
are still awaited. The reception had
cost a little under £2000; full figures will be available at the next meeting.
Item 386 Future work of the London
Green Belt Council
The
Secretary observed that in some ways LGBC seemed to be running out of
work. He said that fewer matters were referred
to him by members now than were a few years ago and he was writing fewer
letters. Mr Liffen thought that this was
because the present PPG2 had been in force for 12 years; developers were now
able to judge accurately what would be allowable and what would not. The Secretary added that it also helped,
firstly, that many planning authorities were adopting much of the wording of
PPG2 in their plans rather than trying to make up new wording and, secondly,
that the Government continued to support the Green Belt and this policy was
firmly applied by the Planning Inspectorate.
Mr Hancock considered that this was
a misinterpretation of the situation. He
did not think that the problems were going away or that we were winning the
battle. There was a danger of centralism
taking over. The fact that LGBC’s agenda was not as heavy as it was could
simply mean that we were accepting too readily that what we could do would not
be effective.
Mr Ellis suggested that there be a
look at the whole strategy of the LGBC at the next meeting. The Chairman said he had met Mr Mike Gordon
of Harefield, who had agreed to work with Mr Liffen and Mr Atkinson on
education and publicity. He would be
able to produce a pamphlet explaining what LGBC is about. The Chairman will arrange for Mr Gordon to be
at the next meeting. He thought this
would facilitate a discussion of future activities.
Item 387 Officers’ reports on new business since the
last meeting
1. The Chairman said that the issue of
Gypsies and Travellers was back on the agenda; consultants engaged by his local
authority had proposed 21 sites, some of which were quite unsuitable.
2. The Secretary reported that he had
objected to the following planning applications:
(a) Residential
development at Old Tye Avenue/Aperfield Road/Juniper Close, Biggin Hill.
(b) Residential
development including medical centre & nursing home, bus interchange,
childen’s playground and consolidation of allotments at Blue Circle Sports
Ground, Crown Lane, Bromley.
(c) Residential
development at Stanwell House,
(d) A
100-bed hotel at
3. The Vice-President said he had met
Jacqui Lait MP, the shadow minister for
4. Mr Liffen said Sutton Council was
looking for a site to rebuild a school. A site at Orchard Hill belonging to the
local primary care trust is the preferred choice. The site is identified in the
UDP as a major developed site within the Green Belt. It is preferred to a
nearby site also in the Green Belt but not so designated even though there are
some buildings on it. Mr Liffen saw this
as an example of PPG2 in action.
Item 388 Other matters raised by members
1. Mr Beney reminded members that when a
piece of land has been used by a community as of right (i.e. without consent or
permission of the landowner) for at least 20 years, it is possible to have it
registered as a village green. It could be quite a scruffy piece of land. He said that the House of Lords had decided
that if the landowner asserted a contrary right after the registration process
had started, that would not defeat the application. This reversed a lower court decision and many
councils which had been holding applications in abeyance after the earlier
decision would now be able to proceed with them. The situation has been clarified for the
future by the Commons Act 2006.
2. Mr Rogers said that there were reports
in the
3. Mr Bitten reported that permission to
convert the mansion house at
4. The Chairman said that Mrs Oliver, who
was not at the meeting, had reported that an application by Tottenham Hotspur
Football Club for a development including 21 football pitches and associated
buildings at Myddleton House, east of Bulls Cross was going to appeal.
THE DATE OF THE NEXT MEETING
The next meeting will be arranged for either 27th June or 4th
July. Provisionally, 24th
October was earmarked for the following meeting which will be the AGM.