Overview of Space Density relating to Particles

Overview of Space Density Relating to Particles - Providing Definite Proof of Spatial Flow and Strong Explanations for Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, Electron Orbits and Electro Magnetic Attraction.

By Piers Newberry

Abstract

In this paper it is shown that space must have the ability to move. This is shown via experimentation. It allows for an explanation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, electron movement and electro magnetic force.

Spatial Flow

If an electro conductive ball is suspended in a magnetic field and is then spun quickly the mass increases, and consequently the density of space around the ball must increase. Space has moved into the area around the ball. Space must be able to experience the condition of flow.

The Effect of Spatial Flow on Moving Objects

If a ball spinning at R ms moves through space at a velocity V ms. The interface between the top of ball (T) which spins in the direction motion of travel attracts an area of high space density (due higher mass and so more gravitation) as its rate of movement, in terms of interface with surrounding space, is higher than it is at the bottom of the ball (B), R + V as opposed to V - R.

Figure 1 showing V the velocity of the ball, R the rotation of the ball in the x, y plane, and R2 the z plane rotation.

This indicates that there must be some spatial flow from B to T. Both the reduced spatial density at B and the increased spatial density at T mean that the ball curves towards B relative to a fixed observer. If the ball has additional spin in the plane perpendicular to the line of travel R2, so that B swaps with T periodically, the ball experiences harmonic motion. The frequency of the harmonic motion therefore must be determined by the objects size, spin speeds and v.

As the space around the ball is in motion any light shone onto the ball will not experience straight line travel, it is both bent and moved in the spatial flow, therefore the position and consequently the speed of the ball is uncertain to an observer using light, or particle deflection measurement mechanisms. In principle the speed and position of all spinning or moving objects is uncertain for all moving objects unless the exact spatial movements around the object are known. The degree of uncertainty is based on the object’s energy and size. This has an equivalence in logical terms to Hiesenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, though not as yet in a quantative format for its verification.

Special Conditions of Spatial Flow

It is useful to mention an example of spatial geometric effects at this point to illuminate ideas which will be mentioned later.

A spinning particle becomes trapped or bounces away from the surface of a high density body of space if it meets it at B, whereupon in certain conditions,, it will then experience straight line travel. If the particle has sufficient velocity to pass completely into the body of space it will necessarily curve back towards the surface of the plane. The particle can either bounce away from the area of dense space, or become, depending on parameters become trapped.

Figure Two showing the bounce reaction against a plane of dense space indicated by the grey bar.

Figure three. Showing how an electron / spinning particle may become trapped in an area of dense space. This is a simplification in that bands of space density are diffuse.

Gravitation and Space

An interaction exists between matter and space. An interaction of some kind must exist for dense space to form around mass as m is proportional to g. It indicates that there is some mechanism / manner in which mass produces dense space in which mass must somehow absorb and expel space at a certain rate – this has to be true as without interaction of some kind between the quantities their relationship would be non-communicative, and hence non-proportional and non-constant. Whether this is due to perturbations in the fabric of space time, spin, movement or combinations of all these things is as yet pure speculation. It is only certain that interactive relationship must exist, and that the density of space can only exist as an absorption equilibrium throughout the body of the mass, between the mass and the fabric of space.

If two bodies come together, by whatever means, the space between them must flow away and through the bodies for them to meet.

Here is a theoretical model of one scenario in which two particles meet and remain together.

Stage one Particles approach
Stage two Due to excess, as above, the space flows away
Stage three (cross – section) The flow of dense space splits as it is forced out due to absorption of space by particles pulling the streams of space back towards themselves. Further reasoning below.
Stage Three (3d) Showing the process in three dimensions, wherein there is continuous flow of space in a shell form.

At stage three the space emitted around the area at which the two particles join must, as the space has a vector component, focus out a stream of dense space. The focusing must be an important factor in the splitting of the spatial stream, just as light converges and diverges again after it has been through a lens.

Whether stage three can happen depends on the magnitude of the parameters of the absorption and emission rates of space from the particles. It has already been demonstrated that electrons can get stuck into dense space fields. There is no doubt, that with a variety of parameters the model above can exist, and can therefore provide an equivalence model for the structure of the atom.

This is an early stage of investigation it is not seen as useful to make more that a simple outline of the type of processes which might happen. It is possible to create a mathematical model for this to disprove or prove this model in the following way. Work out the spatial emission rates required to create electron clouds of the same size as they are observed for a simple atom with one proton and one neutron. (The parameters used in the formula will have to be variables dependant on one another). Then extend this model to other elements adding protons and neutrons as appropriate. If these additions create observed electron clouds the model has been proved correct.

Primarily the role of shape in emission and absorption of space, as any cup shaped particle, or cup shape arising from the intersection of particles, will have the spatial ejection effect above. As a proton, for example, is comprised of smaller particles it may indeed possess a cup shape, electrons as modeled are deflected into gradations of dense space in all scenarios. A model for electro-magnetic force.

Figure four. A simplified diagram of electron deflection in a graduated area of space.

The ramifications of the flow of space are extremely numerous, and though it may initially appear to be insignificant, and even perhaps not in the field of readers interests, it can be seen to be crucial to the understanding of a wide range of phenomena. With no conjecture, except as to the magnitude of factors, this paper has arrived at a non-abstract description of forces, a viable model of electron shells and the opening of many avenues of investigation. This is evidently a substantial result.