|
|
|
|
Link to Latest newsYet another hangarage advert has appeared in Flight International, this one dated 27th October 1999. It is by a company called 'Weatherall', who have been retained by the Government to offer space in 311 hangar, the one used in recent years only by based helicopters, plus space far Ba125's in Hangar 6 where G-WBPR currently resides. It implies that they are offering the whole of 311 hangar to one company, although 'letting in parts would be considered', presumably to individual operators. The same ad also appeared in the following week's 'Flight'. .
![]()
.
.
It also states that the operating hours of the airfield are 0800-2000 Monday to Friday, makes no mention of weekends although it says that the offer is 'subject to existing MOD limitations on civil usage'. I assume this to refer to the 7000 per year civil limit and possibly to the availability at weekend's if the airfield is open for a military movement.
.
The desirability to operators of these conditions is debatable and time will tell if the offer is taken up. Once again, the problem of the restricted civil access must be a major problem that will surely soon need to be addressed.
.The above advert appeared in Flight International dated 6th October 1999. It seems that a company called 'Platinum Air Charter Executive 2000' are offering management and hangarage services at Northolt. It is known that the company have had an office at Northolt for a time, and that they operate a Beech 200 Super King Air registered G-PLAT which has visited Northolt recently. Advertising themselves as 'Northolt's premier charter company' seems rather redundant, as they are the only one!
..
The following exchange took place in the House of Lords recently:
(The text is taken from the Hansard web site)
.
Lord Marlesford asked Her Majesty's Government:When they expect to complete their review of the future defence use of RAF Northolt; and
whether they expect to be able to release the 490 acres on this site for housing.[HL3854]Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: the MoD is currently producing a Strategic Development
Plan for the Defence Estate of Greater London. The future of RAF Northolt forms a part of this
work. While significant progress has been made, the work is still some way from completion and I
am not able to give a date for the publication of the findings. It would be inappropriate for me to
comment on any specific matters to be covered by the report in advance of its completion.Lord Marlesford asked Her Majesty's Government:
How many air movements there were from RAF Northolt during the most recent 12-month
period for which figures are available; how many of these were for VIP and royal flying tasks;
how many for other military and Ministry of Defence charter flights; and how many, on a
repayment basis, for other business users.[HL3855]Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: The last 12-month period for which figures are available is
January to December 1998. In that year there were a total of 13,575 aircraft movements, a
movement being defined as a take-off or landing. This total was made up of 4,626 movements by
RAF aircraft, 110 movements by civilian aircraft on UK Government business, 1,838 movements by
other military aircraft and 6,997 civilian aircraft movements, of which 6,257 were on a repayment
basis. Separate figures for VIP and Royal tasks could only be provided at disproportionate cost.
.As of mid September the ILS is almost exclusively being used by based aircraft. Although the system is fully available to all it seems that charts are not yet generally available and the publication of these by Jeppesen and Aerad should see an increase in it's use. Although the system is the most modern currently available, it will not be categorized by the Civil Aviation Authority as it is not their policy to do so at Military airfields. Unofficially it is a category 1 system.
.The Instrument Landing System on runway 25 was flight checked on 1st/2nd September 1999 and subsequently declared operational. The system had been installed during August by Racal Ltd, the winners of a bidding competition for the contract. Flight checking was carried out by Beech 200 G-FPLB of Flight Precision Ltd.
.
An ILS was one of the suggestions made by the inquiry into the Learjet accident in August 1996, but was rejected at the time on the grounds of lack of infrastructure. It now seems that modern techniques and equipment have overcome these problems. The system has been installed on runway 25 only and comprises of an in-line ILS/DME 3.5 degree glide path.
.
Twin Squirrel ZH141 is currently (August 1999) being re-painted into standard 32 sqn scheme at Oxford, according to information received. The aircraft has been operating in it's civil allover blue scheme since acquisition. The remaining grey Ba125's will lso be repainted in due course.
.
A new VHF tower frequency, 120.675 was brought into operation on 12th August 1999. Apparently this change was due to the old frequency, 124.975, conflicting with another airfield, although the change has also cured the regular problem of erroneous calls from aircraft inbound to Heathrow wanting 134.975.
.
The publishing of the Government's review of defence estate in London, which was due in July has been delayed until the new year at least according to an article on the front page of the local paper dated 9th June 1999. The delay is being blamed on the Kosovo crisis. The mood of the article was positive, including the comments from the local residents representatives. It is also suggested that there are plans for a hangar extension, as well as the above mentioned ILS which leads locals to believe that the airfield will remain in MOD hands.
.A VHF ATIS is now broadcasting on 125.125. It was first noted on 19th April. Hopefully it will be more successful than the last attempt on 134.15 over six months ago which had to be removed due to breakthrough on London Control frequencies. A VHF ATIS at a military airfield must be almost unique in the UK, although a UHF version has been running for many years, currently on 300.35.
.
Scenes for the next James Bond movie were filmed on the north side of the airfield on the evening of Thursday 15th and Friday 16th April. A Casa 212, F-GOGN arrived for the filming and stayed a couple of days. Apparently the scenario was Mr Bond breaking into a Turkish air base and hijacking the aircraft.
.An article in the local paper dated 14th April gives 'details' of a meeting that the Station commander attended. It seems to guarantee the future of the base, suggesting that a couple more military units may be relocated here, although the civil side of things seems unfortunately stagnant. The text of the article follows: Royal Squadron lease plan is on ice, says base commander
NOT only is the Royal Squadron safe in the hands of RAF Northolt, the base may be expanded.
RAF Northolt station commander, Gp Capt Jeremy Witts, told a Community Consultative Group meeting on Thursday. The whole process of leasing aircraft for No 32 (The Royal) Squadron had for now, ground to a halt. He said while there had been a lot of interest expressed by private companies in leasing the aircraft; it was unlikely to be done in the new financial year.
The base already uses three twin engined Squirrel helicopters which have been leased privately.
Some 13% of the flying by No 32 (TR) Squadron is for the royal family, with 55 per cent for government business and the remainder military.Gp Capt Witts also poured cold water on a number of rumours about the future of the squadron and RAF Northolt. He said the squadron was not being sold off and not being privatised. It would continue to be run by the RAF and staffed by air force crew based at RAF Northolt, which celebrates it’s 80th anniversary next year.
Gp Capt Witts also dismissed rumours about the base being developed as a major civil airport or that its commercial activities are to be increased. Currently the airfield at West End Road, Ruislip, is restricted to 7,000 civil movements a year. He said the airfield had never exceeded this limit, although last year it recorded 6,997 movements.
There is no limit on the number of military aircraft movements at the base, and with recent unrest in the middle east and the conflict in Kosovo, the base had recorded it’s expected aircraft movements for this month by April 3.
The meeting also heard the Strategic Defence Review, Greater London Defence Estate Review and Strategic Development Plan were in favour of retaining the status quo at RAF Northolt. Gp Capt Watts said: "There is nothing radical in the Strategic Development Plan, which is currently with the Treasury, apart from the possibility that two units currently based elsewhere may be moved to RAF Northolt . The minister has recognised the strategic, value of the base and that other options could not emulate the key range of benefits currently afforded by RAF Northolt."
Don Ticehurst, chairman of the South Ruislip Residents' Association, welcomed news that RAF Northolt may benefit from the government's reviews of its defence forces. He said: "It's good to know RAF Northolt's value is being recognised. It is important to the community and to hear it may be expanded because of the review is welcome."
A couple of comments from me:
- it's nauseating to see the head of the residents association now strongly supporting the base after months'years of antagonism!- The 'putting the leasing in idea on ice' means very little, as it is only for 'this financial year', a very short time span in business anyway.
- It is disappointing that there are 'no plans for further commercial activitivities' (what ever that means), especially as the article points out that 6997 out of 7000 civil slots were used last year, proving that an increase is desperately needed!
As of 31st March Ba125-800 G-WBPR is now based at Northolt. The aircraft has been a regular visitor here for over ten years, having originally been based at Heathrow, then Luton. It is operated by the Granada Group PLC and arrived at 1822 on 31/3/99, later taxying to the North side hangers at 1835. This is probably the first civil aircraft to be based at Northolt in a non-military associated role and certainly the first civil executive jet! Maybe more will follow....
.![]()
.G-WBPR pictured lining up on runway 25 during resurfacing work
.
The leasing in of jet aircraft for 32(TR) Sqn will go ahead according to the local paper dated 17th March. An answer from the Government to a local MP's question has said that the aircraft will be flown by military crews out of Northolt, in a similar operation to that currently done by the Squirrels. An official announcement is expected within weeks. This appears to guarantee Northolt's future as an airfield. There are several interesting improvements to the facilities rumoured which will be reported here when officially announced.
.
ZH141 has been confirmed as the new serial of AS355B Squirrel G-OILX.
It was first noted as such on 25th February. Registration G-OILX was cancelled from the UK Civil register as 'sold to the MOD'. The aircraft has been operating from Northolt for some time, in an overall dark blue colour scheme. This event seems to confirm the extension of the OSS contract, and also a long term role for 32(TR)sqn at Northolt, although the serial is a surprise, being the use of an unused serial allocated some years ago. The aircraft will be repainted into the standard scheme in due course.
.![]()
Squirrel ZH141, together with an enlargement of the tail boom showing the serial (JB)
.
The Government's reply to the Transport Committee Report of June 1998 was published in early February. It can be read at http://www.aviation.detr.gov.uk/ras/index
.
The main recommendation in the original report concerning Northolt was that it should become a 'Heathrow Reliever Airfield' to take smaller domestic flights and have fast ground links connecting the two airports.The Government's reply included the following:
29. Proposals for developing both Northolt and Redhill as major civil
airports to relieve Heathrow and Gatwick have been considered and
rejected in the past. The Government does not believe that
circumstances have changed so as to warrant reopening matters
in either case.31. The Ministry of Defence has launched a strategic development plan
to review the defence estate in Greater London; this will include RAF
Northolt. To inform this consideration, DETR has asked NATS to
consider the airspace implications of changes (increases and
decreases) in the use of Northolt: it is possible that reduced use
would free up capacity for Heathrow. Any proposal for the
development of Northolt for aviation purposes would
have to be examined for its environmental, social and economic
impacts, and considered in the light of the Government's declared
policies on planning, sustainable development, and airports.
The Government does not propose to consider any proposals to
develop Northolt as a major civil airport, since it is clear that the
environmental consequences would be unacceptable.32. Dr John Reid, then Minister for the Armed Forces, told Parliament
in June 1998 that an early decision on the future of Northolt was
highly unlikely. He guaranteed that while various studies were in
progress there would be no increase in the ceiling on civil aviation
movements at the airport and no extension in opening hours.So no Heathrow reliever for Northolt, which was what the Base Commander had said all along. However, few clues are given as to the actual future, it seems that it is a case of waiting for the review of MOD property in Greater London is published.
The Daily Vickers flights into Northolt that had ceased in late January 1999 and then operated into Luton have now returned, although occasional flights still operate into Luton rather than Northolt. The company have been operating into here for almost twenty years, initially with Pa31 Navajo (G-BEVK) and Cessna 421C aircraft (G-BEVL) which were later replaced by Beech 200's. In recent years twice daily flights were operated, linking Vickers home airfield of Barrow in Furness with Northolt and Lyneham using Beech 200 G-VSBC (BB1290) and before that G-VSEL (BB362).
.
Earlier, flights also operated to Bournemouth and another company owned airfield, Long Marston near Swindon, which became a car factory. Another Beech 200 aircraft that was operated concurrently with G-VSEL, G-VPLC(BB797) force landed in a field near East Midlands Airport during a flight from Northolt, due to running out of fuel. After that event, the fleet was reduced to one aircraft.
.
The company also operated a Citation 550 G-BSVL during the mid 1980's, although not on the 'milk runs'.
.
Callsigns used reflect the pilot, with VSB01 and VSB02 the two used in recent years, although the co-pilot seems to swop around.
Several local news and teletext reports appeared just after Christmas saying that Hillingdon council was setting up a 'roadshow' to try and raise a groundswell of opinion against using Northolt as a Heathrow reliever airport. Quotes of a possible 25,000 civil movements a year were made, with the usual pollution and traffic problems being brought out again. Considering that it is only a month since the Station Commander assured people in a letter to the local paper that NO significant changes were planned it is difficult to understand why the council have continued wasting money like this. Anyway, the road shows are planned as follows:4/5 Jan - Uxbridge Pavillions shopping centre
7-9 Jan - Manor Farm Library, Ruislip
11-12 Jan - Oak Farm Library, Hillingdon
14-16 Jan - South Ruislip Library
18-19 Jan - Ruislip Manor Library
21-23 Jan - Ickenham Library
25-27 Jan - Central Library, Uxbridge
28-30 Jan - Eastcote Library

The local paper dated 3rd June 1998 had the following front page report:
BID IN FOR NORTHOLT
The
spectre of RAF Northolt being used as a feeder airport for Heathrow has
been
raised once again, along with renewed fears of endless noise and
traffic
pollution.
Stagecoach
Aviation, the airports division of the Scottish-based transport
company,
has outlined plans to turn the military air base into a satellite
airport
to ease overcrowding at Heathrow. Residents fear the Ministry of
Defence
will sell the airbase, leaving them with all the problems associated
with
a civil airport.
RAF
Northolt is in a good position to take traffic from the UK's busiest
airport,
because of it's proximity to the M25 and M40. Matthew Hudson,
chairman
of Stagecoach Aviation, which recently took over Prestwick Airport,
is
expected to outline his plans to the transport select committee on
Wednesday.
News of the plan brought an angry response from a local MP, who
fought
a similar suggestion by the parliamentary select committee two years
ago.
He
said 'I would certainly not be in favour of this. You could be guaranteed
immediate
local opposition. When we visited transport minister Glenda
Jackson
last year, to discuss the future of RAF Northolt, she was very cagey
and
would not put her cards on the table. She would only comment after the
results
of the strategic defence review, which is due out in July. RAF
Northolt
should stay strictly limited to what it is now. This really would
be
my worst fear - a Heathrow North. Traffic congestion is already hideous,
so
I hope and pray it will not happen. It is very grave news and I am
seriously
perturbed. I will be pressing ministers to reveal their hand, they
ought
to come clean for the sake of local residents.
The
Deputy chairwoman of the South Ruislip Residents Association described
the
implications were unthinkable. She said 'this seems as bad as it
could
get.
If anything does happen, the residents will fight it all the way'.
Flt
Lt Martin Smith, RAF Northolt spokesperson said that there were no plans
on
the table to sell RAF Northolt. He said 'Nothing has been done to
place
RAF
Northolt on the market. No bid has been received from Stagecoach
Aviation
or anyone else. We are all awaiting publication of the strategic
defence
review, so we cannot speculate until the outcome of this'.
A local
planning committee councillor said that anyone could apply for
civilian
use at RAF Northolt, but the local council would oppose any
development
not linked to the MOD. 'Any planning application for civil use
would
be opposed on the grounds of increased traffic, aircraft noise and the
effect
on the environment', he said......
Another case of press over reaction, I'll wager. The idea was rejected before and will be rejected again. Whether the underlying implication is that the airfield will be operated in it's current role by a civilian company is not known. It is interesting to note the MP's interpretation of the Glenda Jackson meeting now as compared to then. Before he said that the meeting was 'useful' - now he's saying that she was 'cagey'! Another noteworthy fact is that the matter seems to be being referred to a higher authority, with the MP saying that 'he hopes and prays that it will not happen'! Is this an admission of helplessness through normal channels? I'm sure that there will be much more said on this story, which I will report as soon as it is known.