IMAGE
AND REALITY
What
does a picture mean to you? No, not a farm-cart rolling through a ford, or an
old ship with a fiery sunset behind it, but a picture of someone you can
recognise - Keanu Reeves, maybe, or Leonardo di Caprio. If you like them,
you'll put them up somewhere you can look at them all the time. In the old
days, when schoolchildren by and large stayed in one classroom all day and the
teachers moved round (which, if you think about it, was a lot quicker) you
would have had a desk of your very own and you might even have pinned pictures
of your favourite people on the inside of the lid. No one would have
interfered, provided you didn't open it during the lesson, except to get a book
out, of course, and maybe a little glimpse of Liam Gallagher would have helped
you concentrate better on your French – or maybe not.
If
you don't like these people, then maybe you'll scribble moustaches or rude
words or big ears or vampire's fangs on their pictures wherever you see them,
or maybe you'll tear them down and stamp on them or rip them up. In some ways,
you're doing that to the person in the picture, even though you wouldn't – or
couldn't – in real life.
Native
Americans (who used to be called Red Indians, though their skins weren't
exactly red, and they were anything but Indians) were very scared of cameras.
They thought that white men who took pictures of them were stealing their
souls, because they were walking away with their images, with their likenesses.
That didn't worry them with mirrors (yes, they had mirrors, highly polished
bronze ones, before white men came and sold them cheap glass ones whose
silvering came off at the slightest excuse), nor did it worry them when they
saw their reflections in still pools or bowls of water. Those images didn't
last. They were only there for as long as you were looking at them. Look away,
or ruffle the surface of the water by just blowing on it, and they were gone,
and the person whose image it was was free to go on living and change and be
different and carry their own image around with them. They didn't have to leave
it as a hostage in someone else's hands, or worry in case it might be stolen.
They didn't have to compare themselves now with the way they were then, the way
we do.
We
love images. Maybe we love them even more than reality. They're certainly a lot
easier to deal with. You can cut them out and stick them where you want to and
keep them in your pocket and make them your slaves, which you can't usually do
with real people. Real people say things like: "Why didn't you call me
last night?" "We haven't been out together in a week!"
"You've forgotten my birthday again!" "You're such a messy
eater!" "Your breath smells!" "You're not going to wear
those ragged old jeans, are you?" But images just sit and smile and smile.
Not much conversation, of course, but at least they don't say things you'd
rather not hear.
And
they don't change. They don't suddenly decide to stop being your best friend
for no reason. Though not changing isn't necessarily something positive.
Everybody
changes, after all. Bits of us drop off and new bits grow. Not big bits, but
skin and hair and nails. The nails we have to cut, and the hair, too, mostly,
but the skin really does just drop off and floats around in the air, where you
can see it when the sun shines, and it settles on surfaces as dust. That
doesn't happen to images. And it's not always nice, when we've changed, to be
confronted and compared with something that hasn't.
You
can see it when parents go through the photo album they started when you were a
baby. If you're really unlucky, there may even be a video of you saying your
first words or just rolling around naked and gurgling. Then there's that dreamy
look in your parents' eyes when they remember how much better behaved, how much
less of a worry you were at the age of three than you are now, how much less
demanding, how much cheaper... Terrifying things, photographs. Yet people want
them - for all the reasons I've just explained. Not always photographs of
themselves, but certainly photographs of others. And the school helps to
organise it. That's what a school is for: to organise things. Not always to
make sure that everything happens that should happen, but at least to provide
the framework so that it can.
If
you were really looking for someone to blame for what happened to Louise and
Amy, then it would probably have to be the supply teacher, because, although he
was a teacher, he didn't know everything. For instance, when he called the
register that morning he didn't know all the right abbreviations for the
class's first names. They didn't resent it too much, and they muddled through.
And then he started calling out the names of people who hadn't paid for
something or other – only of course they had, but the list hadn't been changed,
only he couldn't know that. But they told him, and he believed them, so that
was all right. And finally, in the bottom of the plastic wallet that held the
register and notes excusing absence and bulletins two months old and notices about
school teams who'd played their last match three months before, he found a
piece of paper fresh as the day it was written (whenever that might have been,
because it didn't have a date) telling Louise to go at once to the Hall to have
her photograph taken. He was happy about that, because it was a simple
instruction and he could pass it on and he was sure about its being carried
out.
Louise
was a little puzzled, because no one else was being sent to the photographer,
and in fact there hadn't been a photographer in the school for a few months,
and you always knew when there was one, because he was in the hall all day and
everyone went past between lessons and had a gawp at whoever was having their
soul stolen at the time. Still, although this was a day with long registration,
there was no assembly in the hall, so she went along to see what was happening.
The
hall was dark. She couldn't tell why. Perhaps the curtains were drawn. A cloud
must have just moved away from the sun, though, because now there was suddenly
a shaft of brilliant light crossing the whole of the space. She could see
little specks of dust dancing in it. Because of the light, the shadows in the
far corner by the door to the stage looked even darker. In fact, they almost
began to take on a shape, though it wasn't one she exactly recognised. If it
was any shape at all, it was the shape of a black curtain, except that the
stage didn't have any curtains like that. Then she knew what it was: it was the
sort of cloth that old-fashioned photographers used to put over their heads to
keep out the light when they were looking at the back of their cameras, where
they could see the picture they were going to take before they took it, upside
down, projected on a ground glass screen.
Then
the photographer straightened up, and there wasn't any black curtain there any
more, and certainly not one of those big box cameras on a wooden tripod. There
was just a man with a neatly trimmed, very pointed black beard, and bright
eyes, and wearing something that might have been a very smart black suit with a
scarlet waistcoat, or might have been a cloak with a scarlet lining, she
couldn't quite tell.
"What
do you want?" he said, and as he spoke, he shifted from foot to foot, and
she could see that he had a slight limp, but was used to concealing it.
"I
want you to take my photograph," said Louise.
"Ah,"
said the man, "but you don't just want me to take the photograph,
you also want me to give the photograph to you – isn't that so?"
"Ye-es,"
said Louise, not certain where this was leading. There's always something
slightly dodgy about photographers, she thought. "I don't expect you just
to give it to me," she added, "we'll pay for it."
"Oh
yes, you'll pay," said the man. "Everyone always does. But I have to
take something first."
She
was waiting for him to tell her to come closer, to get into position, to smile,
to hold it, to do the same again – but he said none of those things. Instead,
there was a kind of flash that blinded her, and she realised that she'd taken
two steps down the stairs into the hall, and ended up right in the sunbeam and
been blinded by it, and then she put her head through the other side of it, as
it were, and looked across to the far corner, and saw the man's head bowing
down, and his white face disappearing into the black folds of whatever it was
he was wearing, and then there was nothing there at all, except shadows, and as
she took two steps nearer, even those disappeared, because somebody opened the
door from the stage and light spilled out and down the steps, washing all the
darkness away.
It
was then she realised that she was holding something in her hand, a piece of
card, A5 size, wrapped in a folded piece of plain A4 paper. It must be the
photograph, she thought, but how...
Only
that was when the bell rang, so she didn't have time to think, because her
teacher for first lesson was very strict and she didn't dare be late. As she
reached the corridor, she ran into Amy, her best friend, who was in a different
group for this subject, and was in their tutor room.
"Can
you put this in your locker to keep it safe?" asked Louise, and put the
photograph in her hand. Because she was in such a hurry, she didn't realise
that Amy shouldn't have been in the corridor at all. She was there, because the
supply teacher had found some more notices in the register about a sponsored
swim, and because there had been one short he was taking Amy with him to the
photocopier to make a copy of the last one to give to Louise. (Amy was a very
good friend like that, and had reminded the supply teacher that Louise would
need one.)
But
when they got to the photocopier it was sitting blinking at them sadly, saying
that it had no more A4 paper left. Photocopiers are like certain kinds of dogs.
They always make messes and they always look as though they're very sorry about
it. But it doesn't stop them always making messes. However, photocopiers are
not as lovable as dogs, and they don't squeal when they get kicked, and they
don't have big soulful eyes, so the people they annoy tend to slam their lids
quite hard, though it doesn't do any more good in the way of stopping them
doing it again than it does if you scold the dogs and threaten not to feed them
for a month.
The
supply teacher was inventive, though, if nothing else, and he noticed that the
girl beside him (Amy, that is, though he didn’t know her name) was holding just
what he needed, namely a piece of A4 paper, even if it was folded in two. So he
asked her if he could have it, and Amy didn't see why not, so she gave it to
him, and he opened the right tray and put it in, and the machine told him he
would have to wait. Well, he couldn't wait, because he had to go off and take a
class (Louise's class, in fact, so she needn't actually have worried about
being late) so he tapped in the right code ready, and set it for one copy and
told Amy to put the sheet on the glass and wait for the machine to work.
So
far, so good. Amy was never quite sure what went wrong. If she'd shut the lid,
it wouldn't have happened, but she hadn't been told to do that - in fact, the
flash of the photocopying blinded her for a moment or two. Maybe her hands
slipped, because she was pressing the paper she had to copy down too hard...
Anyway, when the sheet of A4 came out, it hadn't got anything about the
sponsored swim on it, but it did have two black and white images of Amy's
hands. Still, she had no time to worry about that, and she could always get a
spare copy of the notice for Louise from the office, so she ran off to her
first lesson.
And
during the first lesson, Louise had more fun than Amy - if you can call it fun.
Because the supply teacher was in charge, and not the strict teacher they
usually had, they messed about. And messing about meant, among other things,
drawing on each other's faces. Louise and the boy beside her gave as good as
they got, so it wasn't fair that when the teacher noticed he moved Louise and
threatened her with a detention, because she didn't have any marks on her
face. She'd only done it in self-defence, and she was going to argue – but then
she caught sight of herself in the shiny inside lid of her pencil-tin, and it
was right, she didn't have any marks on her face, even though she could
feel the skin stinging where the boy's ballpoint had gone across it. The boy
couldn't believe it either, and he made several more marks on his own face and
hands, seeing whether his pens still wrote. The teacher noticed those, and
concluded he must have made all the marks on himself, so he apologised to
Louise, and gave the boy a detention instead.
Amy,
meanwhile, had suddenly found all kinds of black stains on her hands, and
couldn't imagine where they'd come from. She showed them to Louise in the next
lesson, but the teacher kept them working so hard they didn't have time to
talk, and it was just at the start of break, when she went to get out her
snack, that Amy found a bottle of ink in her bag had leaked all over the
photocopy of her hands that she'd stuck in there. Louise wanted to ask about
her photograph, which she hadn't had a chance to look at, but Amy was in a
temper, and pulled the ink bottle and the piece of paper out of her bag and
threw them in the waste-bin and went off to see if any of the teachers had
something that could get the ink off her hands. So Louise just went to the
toilets, and there she found some other girls who were trying out make-up that
they'd brought in (but shouldn't have), and she tried some too, though she had
to do it by guesswork, because they wouldn't let her in to see in the mirror,
and then, surprise of surprises, a teacher came in, to see if anyone was
smoking - it was a surprise because that usually happened at lunchtimes – and
the teacher said to Louise, "Well, you're obviously just an innocent
bystander, so you'd better run along," and Louise was amazed, because she
knew she'd tried the lipstick and the blusher and the eye-shadow, and she
couldn't imagine why it didn't show up, but she ran along anyway and counted
her blessings.
In
the next lesson, Amy was no fun at all, because she was still worrying about
the stains on her hands – not just the old ones, but new pink ones that kept on
appearing. Louise had been avoiding trouble so easily all morning that she
found it hard to feel sympathetic, and could barely wait for lunch, in order to
see her photograph. But when Amy gave her the key to her locker, and she got
the photograph out and looked at it, it was her turn to be in a bad temper.
"Who
have you let scribble all over my picture?" she asked in dismay. Amy,
still rubbing and spitting, didn't answer. But then Louise looked more closely,
and saw the lipstick and the blusher and the eye-shadow she'd put on at
break-time, and the ballpoint lines she could just still feel on her skin.
"Amy,"
she said, "look at this!"
"Look
at what?" said Amy grumpily, still rubbing at stains that wouldn't move.
"All
these marks on my picture," said Louise, "they ought to be on
me."
Amy
thought for a minute. The stains on her hands had appeared before she
ever put her hands into her bag where the ink had leaked. And the ink had run
all over – what? – a picture of her hands... She went to the waste-bin,
despite Louise's protests, and fished out the photocopy. It was quite a way
down, and somebody had thrown a leaking bottle of cherryade on top of it. When
she picked it out, the pink drops were running off it, as were some drops of
the black ink. The photocopy wasn't stained at all.
It
took them all the lesson after lunch to work out what had happened and what to
do about it, and they could only really express it properly and fully after the
bell had gone for the end of the day.
"So,"
said Louise, "mine shows the marks that ought to be on me."
"And
mine," said Amy, "puts the marks on me that ought to be on it."
"One's
positive," said Louise.
"And
the other's negative," said Amy.
"So,"
said Louise, "they ought to cancel out."
"After
all," said Amy, "they were together to start with."
As
they were talking, they wandered into the hall. It was deserted, and strangely
dark - the curtains were closed – perhaps there'd been a film-show – except for
a sharp beam of sunlight, with dust-motes dancing in it, which shone almost
straight into their eyes. Louise brought out her disfigured photograph and Amy
wrapped her photocopy around it, and together they held the joint object out
into the sunbeam, the way you light a piece of paper from a flame, carefully,
without burning yourself. There was a kind of flash - though it may just have
been the sunlight hitting a shiny part of the grand-piano - which blinded them
both - and when they could see again, there was nothing in their hands, but
perhaps a few more dust-motes dancing in the sunbeam.
"Look
at your hands!" said Louise. "They're all clean!"
"And
look at your face!" said Amy. "You're just like a Red Indian!"
And
so she was, with all the ball-point and the make-up. But it was all right
really, because Amy was there to help her get it off before they went home,
since they were, after all, best friends.
10am - 9pm
29.i.2003