Huguenot Link


information compiled by Cathy Day        arrived 29th June 2005

cathy.day@homemail.com.au


   You might recall that last year we talked about the family legend that the WHITERs were originally Huguenots, and that the family name was originally "DE WHITTIER". This was a fairly persistent rumour, as several branches repeated essentially the same story.

    It seems that one branch of the family, at least, were descended from Huguenots, but the original refugees from France weren't called WHITER, or any variant. This explains both David's observation on an Irish connection, and the dearth of WHITER information in Huguenot records.

Mary BARBIER (also known as BARBER) was born in Bethnal Green
on 21 Aug 1779 and baptised at St Mathew's on 5 Sep 1779.

She was the daughter of George BARBIER (or BARBER) and his wife Elizabeth YARDLEY, who had been married in
St Dunstan's Stepney in 1777.

 According to Pallot's Marriage Index, Mary married
James WHITER in Hackney in 1802, although I have not seen
 the original record.
There is a lot of information about James and Mary WHITER
 on David Dells' website.

Mary was a Huguenot descendent, and was entitled to retire
 to the French Protestant Hospital, which she did on 4 Jun 1853.
In order to gain admission, one had to prove one's Huguenot
 descent. Mary's sister Elizabeth (born 15 Sep 1777), two nieces,
a cousin and a granddaughter were all elected to the hospital and each provided information on their Huguenot ancestors.
I think that because so many of them went to the hospital for
 their final years, our ancestors retained the information that they
 were of Huguenot descent.
This is correct, except that it was not through the WHITER line,
 but through the BARBIER line.

    Mary's father was George BARBIER, and he was the son of Michel BARBIER, "a native of France". I am still wading through masses of information on this family, and have not yet pinned them
all down, but am still working on it.

    I would be happy to share any of the details of the above relationships with anyone who is interested.


Notes:  I G I seems a bit thin on Hackney records!

1841 Census would suggest that      1 James Street,Bethnal Green

was the home of both    James and Mary    and   John and Susannah

with a couple of so far unmarried children.


Counter